This graphic was released by Josep Borrell, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, on October 23.
And he is right. Because his reaction to the crisis in the Middle East has destroyed what little credibility the EU may have ever had.
European Union foreign-policy chief Josep Borrell on Wednesday demanded the international community impose a “solution” to the conflict between Israel and Palestinian terrorists in Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip.
“What we have learned over the last 30 years, and what we are learning now with the tragedy experienced in Gaza, is that the solution must be imposed from outside,” Borrell said.
“Peace will only be achieved in a lasting manner if the international community gets involved intensely to achieve it and imposes a solution,” he added, referring to the United States, Europe and Arab countries.
And Borrell has been very clear on what "solution" he wants to impose: creating a Palestinian state on land that Israel claims and that it necessary for Israeli security.
At a press conference yesterday, he made it pretty clear that he viewed October 7 as an opportunity, not a tragedy:
Europe has to invest all its political capital ...[to] seek peace in the Middle East through the only possible solution, which is the construction of two states. Something that we have been repeating for many years, but without fully committing ourselves to making it a reality.
The drama that began on October 7 and continues today forces us to seek a solution that allows the coexistence in peace and security of Israel and Palestine.
Yes, a massacre is now merely a "drama" according to Borrell.
Thousands of Palestinians joyfully slaughtering, raping, kidnapping and burning every Jew they could find means, to him, that Palestinians deserve a state of their own.
The entire Palestinian Arab population supporting the massacre by a 6-1 ratio does not cause Borrell to pause at all. On the contrary, it seems that the more they cheer the genocide of Jews, the more they should be rewarded with a state that they can freely attack with rockets from every direction.
One must wonder - is there anything that Palestinians could possibly do to make him think that perhaps they don't deserve a state of their own?
This would be a state where Palestinians would be expected to freely enter Israel for employment, but where Jews would no longer be allowed to visit their own holy places. A state where incitement to murder Jews would be openly taught in schools and mosques. A state where every single child is told that their neighboring state in "recognized borders" is illegitimate and must also be destroyed. A state where the national heroes are Dalal Mughrabi and Samir Kuntar and Sheikh Yassin.
So, yes, the way the EU deals with this "drama" indeed will define its credibility for years to come. And that credibility is less than zero.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Last week, Israel's Defense Minister Yoav Gallant made an obvious but important point that the world is ignoring.
“We are in a multi-front war. We are being attacked from seven fronts — Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), Iraq, Yemen and Iran," he said. "We have already responded and acted on six of those fronts.”
A key component to propaganda is framing. Framing this as an Israel-Gaza war is false, and ultimately serves the interests of Israel's enemies.
When this war is framed as a war between Israel and Gaza, then the attacks by Yemen, Hezbollah, Iraqi groups and Syria become "support for Gaza," which a moment of reflection shows is ridiculous. They aren't helping Gazans in the least.They are using Gaza as an excuse for attacking Israel from all directions.
Whether or not Iran chose October 7 to attack Israel or whether it was Hamas' decision, right now the war is being directed by Iran and proxies doing Iran's bidding.
Israel's enemies want to frame this as a David vs. Goliath of huge Israel bombing helpless innocent Gazans, and the world is buying into this false framing. Every time an official says they do not want the Gaza war to "spread" to other theatres like Lebanon they are showing that Iran's framing is working. Nothing about Gaza compelled Hezbollah, Syria, Iraqi groups and the Houthis to attack different parts of Israel.
Hezbollah actively attacked Israel on October 8th, claiming it was in "solidarity" with the "Palestinian people." This is not a war passively "spreading," attacking Israel is not compulsion but decisions that these groups make.
And all the groups happen to be part of Iran's "axis of resistance."
The media is happily going along with this false framework. Why are we not seeing maps in the news media similar to the one I created here? Because that is not the narrative that the media wants its readers to see.
They want to pretend it is "Gaza under attack," not "Israel under attack," even though the war started with an attack on Israel and it continues with multiple, multi-front and continuous attacks on Israel.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s two senior far-right partners endorsed the rebuilding of settlements in the Gaza Strip and the encouraging of “voluntary emigration” of Palestinians on Monday.
Speaking during their parties’ respective faction meetings in the Knesset, National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich presented the migration of Palestinian civilians as a solution to the long-running conflict and as a prerequisite for securing the stability necessary to allow residents of southern Israel to return to their homes.
The war presents an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,” Ben Gvir told reporters and members of his far-right Otzma Yehudit party, calling such a policy “a correct, just, moral and humane solution.”
The “correct solution” to the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict is “to encourage the voluntary migration of Gaza’s residents to countries that will agree to take in the refugees,” Smotrich told members of his Religious Zionism party
I'm no fan of Smotrich or Ben Gvir. But what on Earth is wrong with allowing Gazans who want to emigrate to do so?
Not involuntary "transfer." Not Meir Kahane's plan to ship Arabs out on trucks. This is simply to allow those who want to leave to do so.
We know that hundreds of Gazans have risked their lives to reach Europe by boat. Obviously there is a desire by many to leave the sector.
The United States rejects recent statements from Israeli Ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir advocating for the resettlement of Palestinians outside of Gaza. This rhetoric is inflammatory and irresponsible. We have been told repeatedly and consistently by the Government of Israel, including by the Prime Minister, that such statements do not reflect the policy of the Israeli government. They should stop immediately.
We have been clear, consistent, and unequivocal that Gaza is Palestinian land and will remain Palestinian land, with Hamas no longer in control of its future and with no terror groups able to threaten Israel. That is the future we seek, in the interests of Israelis and Palestinians, the surrounding region, and the world.
If nearly a third of Gazans want to move elsewhere, is that irresponsible? Obviously not. But somehow when far-Right lawmakers in Israel agree with them,it becomes irresponsible.
Gaza is crowded and poor. Without a drastic change, it has a dim future. Ambitious Palestinians have been emigrating around the world since 1948. Many have established themselves and become successful. What is wrong with that?
Obviously Smotrich and Ben Gvir would be happy if 100% of Gazans would move elsewhere. But for all their faults, they are not advocating throwing the Palestinians into the sea, as Arabs have been threatening the Jews for 75 years. And neither are any of the other Israelis who have floated the idea of voluntary resettlement of Gazans to elsewhere in the world.
No one would be too upset if Saudi Arabia offered Israeli Jews a million dollars to move elsewhere. Nearly one in three Gazans don't even need a monetary incentive - they'd move for free if only a country would let them in to become citizens.
Something that would be considered human rights in any other context is considered vaguely racist when Jews support it. And that is the real bigotry.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Yet — Biden/Harris, Antony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Lloyd Austin, Senate/House Democrats publicly urge Israel to ramp down, even stop its military in Gaza. Imagine FDR in newspapers (read by the Nazis) — scolding Churchill — “Not victory, Winston, it’s stalemate, stupid!”
Consequently, as Israel modifies (the U.N. will condemn Israel anyway), IDF casualties mount, and the war is prolonged. IDF reservists include teachers, professors, doctors, lawyers, engineers, scientists, artists, musicians, chefs, store owners, and more. Should they die to placate the intellectual frauds who dominate our schools and universities? DEI ideology: its Jew-hating coalition discards reality; Iran and its proxy Hamas are hardly bastions of women’s rights, gay rights, the environment. (READ MORE from Arnold Steinberg: How Conservatives Can Start a Youth Revolution)
Palestinian genocide? Gaza’s population has grown exponentially. The Hamas playbook, not Israel, puts noncombatants in harm’s way. Note: The number of Arabs killed by Israel in all wars and conflicts since its founding in 1948 is dwarfed by the number of Arabs killed by Arabs. No outrage or demonstrations. Akin to BLM’s indifference to black-on-black murder. (Does anyone care, for example, about how many Christians have been killed by Islamists in Africa? The Vatican reported that 52,250 Christians have been murdered by Islamists over 14 years in Nigeria alone.)
Especially in the Middle East, Bad Guys respect strength. Biden, after the Afghanistan fiasco, is perceived as weak. His policies enrich Iran: higher oil prices, relaxed sanctions, billions released. Is Biden’s team of Obama holdovers arguably traitorous? (One outed so far). The good news is most are just stupid!
Biden’s patron Obama was obsessed with Muslim outreach; Obama’s deep proximity to his spiritual guru, America/white/Jew-hating Rev. Jeremiah Wright, was not incidental. Anti-Zionists claim Jews used the Holocaust to justify stealing Arab land. Obama obliged, publicly basing Israel’s existence on the Holocaust, yet Zionism predated it. In effect, Obama deprecated the historic claim of Jews to their ancestral land.
“Some say that anti-Zionism isn’t tantamount to antisemitism,” Joshua Muravchik recently wrote. “If so, it’s worse … Anti-Zionism can only mean the destruction of Israel … some seven million Jews.”
Enabled by the UN, Hamas and the so-called “moderate” Palestinian Authority (PA) nurture children in hate to exterminate Jews. Thus, a “Palestinian state” was a nonstarter, a farce absent resolving the prerequisite as told by Golda Meir: “They say we must be dead. And we say we want to live. I don’t know of a compromise.”
The “compromise” — a “two-state solution of a Palestinian state living in peace” alongside Israel — remains oxymoronic, a fallacy because too many Palestinians addicted to genocide still want Israel off the map. You don’t reform a lying alcoholic who says he’ll quit drinking by giving him a liquor store.
That’s why for decades the unrealistic expectations for a Palestinian state foster disappointment. The “Palestinian leadership” continues to groom Jew-killers from childhood. The next generation is already poisoned. To undo their indoctrination, if possible, would take generations — before any Palestinian state can exist.
On December 4, Time magazine published the article “It’s time to scrap the Abraham Accords.” The author, Sarah Leah Whitson, a director of Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), argued that the Hamas attack of October 7 proved that the assumption on which the Abraham Accords were conceived – that the Palestinian issue was no longer important in Israel’s relationships in the region – was wrong.
She maintained that conditions for the Palestinian people had worsened since the accords were signed, and that the Gaza war has projected the Palestinian issue back to the forefront of global concerns. When signing the Accords, she claimed, the Arab leaders involved “hailed the agreement as a means to encourage and cajole Israel to take positive steps toward ending its occupation and annexation of Palestinian territory.”
Now, she wrote, “because continued Arab adherence to the accords signals continued support for Israel,” DAWN is calling on the Abraham Accords countries to withdraw from the agreement.
Whitson was wrong
Both her assumptions and her conclusions are incorrect. The Israel-Palestine dispute had no bearing on the negotiations leading to the Abraham Accords and is unrelated to them. The purpose of the accords is to advance regional security and stability; pursue regional economic opportunities; promote joint aid and development programs; and foster mutual understanding, respect, coexistence, and a culture of peace.
All the Arab leaders concerned have indicated that normalizing relations with Israel has not affected their support for Palestinian aspirations. There is a brief reference to this in the Bahrain agreement, while the Morocco document mentions “the unchanged position of the Kingdom of Morocco on the Palestinian question.”
Sheer logic dictates that none of the signatories perceive their support as involving the elimination of Israel. Since October 7 none of the four Abraham Accord signatory states has indicated any desire to withdraw from the accords.
Sudan is in the throes of a devastating civil war. Government forces are on the back foot, as the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces continues its advance. On December 19 it captured Sudan’s second largest city, Wad Madani. The future of Sudan, and with it the future of its normalization with Israel, hangs in the balance.
In the other accord countries – the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco – public opinion undoubtedly favors Hamas, deplores the high civilian death toll in Gaza, and calls for a ceasefire. As a result, all three states have been walking a tightrope regarding their official attitude toward the Israel-Hamas conflict. All the same, the accords are holding firm.
There was a time when liberal journalists said the New York Times was too nice to Israel. They can't make that mistake anymore.
Since Hamas attacked the Jewish state on October 7, the Times has committed to running false and demeaning coverage about Israel. Hours after terrorists began the siege that left 1,200 dead, the Times rushed to humanize the terrorists with a puff piece.
"Gaza Has Suffered Under 16-Year Blockade" aimed to educate readers about why some Gazans saw Hamas's rapes, murders, and kidnappings as a "justified response" against Israel: The Palestinian territory of Gaza has been under a suffocating Israeli blockade, backed by Egypt, since Hamas seized control of the coastal strip in 2007. The blockade restricts the import of goods, including electronic and computer equipment, that could be used to make weapons and prevents most people from leaving the territory.
More than two million Palestinians live in Gaza. The tiny, crowded coastal enclave has a nearly 50 percent unemployment rate, and Gaza's living conditions, health system and infrastructure have all deteriorated under the blockade.
Rather than feature pictures and stories about the innocents killed and taken hostage, the front pages of the Times on October 8 and 9 featured Hamas fighters bulldozing a border fence and firing rockets into Israel.
When a hospital explosion rocked Gaza City, the Times was one of several mainstream media outlets that rushed to blame Israel for the explosion. But the Gray Lady didn't just echo the false claim: It relied on Hamas as its primary source.
Disclaimer: the views expressed here are solely those of
the author, weekly Judean Rose columnist Varda Meyers Epstein.
On October 7 at 6:30 a.m., Meir Adoni [died]. A minute
later, a new Meir was born. A Meir that repents his sin. A Meir who is ashamed
that he was part of the delusion of the delusional Left who don’t understand
that we are surrounded by extreme Islam monsters who have no interest in peace
and normalcy, and only want to burn us alive.
He ended by asking forgiveness from Israel and God for
having identified as left-wing. [1]
The kibbutzim where the slaughter occurred, by all accounts,
lean to the political left. Many or even most of the kibbutz survivors would
tell you they were happy when the settlers were expelled from Gush Katif. They
thought the expulsion would bring peace. That was their ideology.
And their belief was unshaken, even when there were sirens
and rockets and days and nights in safe rooms. They wouldn’t stop educating
their children in the ways of peace. They kept on helping to transport sick children
from Gaza into Israel for treatment in Israeli hospitals. The good farmers
believed that in the end, goodness would prevail and there would be war no
more.
Now in the aftermath of October 7, there is deep disillusionment.
“We are the peaceful people,” they had thought. “No one would harm us,” as if
pureness of heart were a kind of shield.
They couldn’t have imagined a people so cruel. No one could. Only what happened on October 7 could have broken the hope that peace would
yet win out with the people of Gaza. The survivors now understand that Gaza is
filled with monsters, and that there is no possibility of peace with the “Palestinian”
people. That about-face from left to right, is a common theme in the emerging survivor
testimonies.
Nir Shani of Kibbutz Be’eri, managed to hold the door of his
safe room shut, as terrorists shot up his Kibbutz Be’eri home and then set it
ablaze. His 16-year-old son Amit was taken to Gaza, and held hostage. Amit
Shani was released from Hamas captivity on November 29, as part of a temporary
ceasefire deal, 19 days after his father Nir, gave testimony on the October 7
attacks. Nir says that for the people of Be’eri, the peace movement was their
“second religion.” Now Nir knows that peace cannot be achieved at this time,
and that it is unrealistic to believe otherwise [emphasis added]:
We do need everybody, everybody to take responsibility of
their previous actions and those who led to this situation, because I think it
could be prevented and but yeah it—it's complicated now with the Palestinians,
and their education is to hate us so badly and the hope for peace I think, no
longer can exist after what they did.
We're Jewish, but we're not really religious in the kibbutz.
And you can say that our second religion was the peace movement. Like every
celebration we were singing a peace song and wishing for peace and oh, if we
just do another effort, it would come.
But we don't have any partners from the Palestinian side
to—to reach that point. They hate us so badly and [are] not willing. And there
is no peace movement [on] the Palestinian side. Not at all. They're just
saying, “Yeah, we want to kill them all. We want to send them away.”
So it would take another generation or two with great effort
in education to change that. If at all. I think after what they did, we can't
stay neighbors any longer. And there must be a certain solution to the problem.
. . . the western
world [sees] the Palestinian in a very romantic and maybe even childish way. I
think we really, really wanted to live by them . . . and have peace with them,
but they’re not cooperating about it. And the western world expects us to
behave by certain rules of engagement that are not [the way of] the Middle
East. It's like, based on the knight [battles] in [medieval] Europe.
But here it so different, as you could see in October 7th,
and we have to protect [ourselves]. We have no other choice, and I wish it
would be different, but for the time being, that is the situation. We have to
do whatever is necessary to protect [ourselves].
I mean, the—“the occupation,” “the occupation” all the
time. It's not something that we want to do, it's just something that you have
to do because otherwise they would be jumping to our throats and kill us.
So we have no other choice but to do that and in the most moral way that we
can, I think. I mean, we really wish [there was] another way to solve the
problem, but that's the situation. That's the reality we live in.
The world should understand that and demand the Palestinians
to change their ways and stop supporting [them], because they get a lot of
support and it's not helping to solve the problem.
Tali Enoshi-Arad, 37, huddled in the safe room of her home
in Kibbutz Holit for hours on that bloody day in October, along with her
husband and three-year-old daughter. The Enoshi-Arad family had left the big
city for a “quieter” life on this kibbutz situated close to the Gaza border.
Now Tali contemplated putting her hand over her little girl’s mouth to keep her
quiet so the terrorists wouldn’t hear and discover them, bringing to mind
tragic stories from the Holocaust, of mothers desperately trying to still a
baby’s cry, and smothering them in the process. The people on Holit were simple
farmers. All they wanted was to raise their children in peace. But now she
knows that will never be [emphasis added]:
People from Gaza [used] to come in to Israel daily and work
in our communities, and some people had very close connections with them um, and
just thinking about the fact that this was the result—obviously they are also
prisoners in their own city, because they're being uh, held [hostage] by their
own government, who doesn't have any care for their safety. They just want to
live up to their diabolic, diabolical uh, I guess goals, murdering Jews,
killing the—destroying the State of Israel. It's in their [Hamas Charter], but
these were not military installations. These were peaceful communities.
We had no form of retaliation, we had no form of attack, we
had no objectives, no . . . no um, offense—barely defense. We were just there to grow some potatoes
and raise our kids in peace and you could, you would think that would have been
enough, but what they did when they went in, was nothing short of deplorable
atrocities.
Hadas Eilon, lived on Kibbutz Kfar Aza, a farming community,
from the age of five until the age of 30, when she deemed it time to leave the
nest and go out on her own. Her mother still lives there, along with her
siblings and their own families. She didn’t live there anymore, but on October
7, Hadas was there with one of her two daughters, for an extended family
gathering. Having grown up among the peace-seekers of a rural community, Hadas
truly believed that if only people spoke with and really listened to each other,
there could be peace. She still wants to believe that—or so it seems—but she is
having to adjust her perceptions.
Now she knows: not all, and perhaps many, or even most Gazans
want peace. The rest want death. It is hard for Hadas to come to terms with
this reality. It appears to help Hadas come to terms with this reality by
mentally separating Gazans and assigning them to one of either two groups:
terrorists and “Palestinians.” This approach does not appear to give her
complete satisfaction; it does seem to give her hope and a way to move forward
[emphasis added]:
I am a person who strongly believes in communication and
human relations.Hearing that drugs were found on them helped me
understand the animals that they were, and at the same time, it was always
so difficult for me to understand extreme people, psychopaths. I mean, it's
impossible to understand. Extreme people, psychopaths, people who want others
to die, that... that I can't understand.
But I also have a hard time generalizing. I also know that
there are people, there are Palestinians who want peace. I think that we have a
. . . completely impossible situation here. But in this completely impossible
situation, something terrible is happening. And again, I was never in favor of
occupation, and I always really have conversations and everything, but when
there is one side, and I'm not saying that we don't have extremists either, but
they don't rule. When there is one side . . . that has a job of destroying and
killing and abusing, and when I hear the phone call of the Palestinian who
called—a terrorist, I won't say Palestinian, because it's a terrorist—I don't
want to generalize Palestinians in any way. A terrorist who calls his parents
and boasts that he murdered ten Jews. It's not human, it's not human behavior,
as far as I'm concerned, they don't . . . do not deserve any forgiveness or any
respect as human beings, because they are not.
So I am ready to make peace with Palestinians and humans
who have a heart and family and children. But with terrorists and human
animals, I'm not ready to make peace. And if someone wants to kill me, I will
kill them first.
Natali Yohanan is a 38-year-old mother of two boys. What
happened to her family on October 7, in their home on Kibbutz Nir Oz, and what
happened to their neighbors, relatives, and friends, killed her faith in
humanity. She no longer believes that peace is possible.
Not in a world where a mother of children can treat another
as she, Natali, was treated by a Gazan mother of children, a civilian who
infiltrated her home on that terrible day. Natali was shocked into reality by
this monster’s cruel behavior toward her and her two sons. The Washington
Free Beacon featured Natali’s story in “Netflix
and Kill: How a Palestinian Woman Took Over an Israeli Family's Home on Oct. 7,”
[emphasis added]:
We had people in the kibbutz who are very involved with the
Palestinian, um people. We had one person he's in Gaza right now, he’s
kidnapped, that he drove sick kids from Gaza to the hospitals in Israel. We're
a very peace-loving community. Like, the country, they always make fun of us
that we're very, like, people-loving and we want peace, and in Israel not
everyone feels the same, but we don't feel the same, anymore.
I always told my son, “There are kids just like you in Gaza.
They just want to go to school, and just want to live, and just want to be
happy and be free,” and that's what I thought before. It's very hard for me as
a mother to think about a woman who came to my home and saw the pictures of my
kids and still came to, to steal and to terrify my kids, and the first thing
she did is to open my [electric box] and [turn] off the electricity. Just in
the safe room.
So she sat and watched TV, and my kids—we had no water, no
food, no air conditioning. It's the middle of the summer. It was so hot.
Like she saw my kids’ pictures on the walls. She knew
there's a family inside—like terrified kids. I think that she's a mother as
well, because she took my kids’ clothes, and she took my clothes, and she took,
um, she took my credit card, and then she went back to Gaza, and she, she went
to the supermarket and she bought . . . I got a list of the things she bought.
It broke my faith that people are good. It’s . . . I
never thought that a woman would do that. Like men? Yes. Soldiers? Yes. Hamas
terrorists? Yes. I knew they were very cruel and very driven, but I never
thought a common people—kids and women—would participate in things like that
and it broke my faith in the goodness of people, but especially people from
Gaza, because I really—I really believed that the women and children were just—they
were kidnapped by Hamas terrorists.
I really believed that Hamas kidnapped Gaza, and um, I don't
anymore. I think they are participating. I think in that morning [Hamas] told
them, “We are going to do this, who wants to come in?” or they invited people
they trust and they told them, “You can take whatever you want. You can take. You
can plunder. You can steal, and we'll keep you safe,” and they told themselves,
“Why not?”
Why not? Like I'm a woman. I'm a mother. I'm a teacher. I
work with kids. I believe that all kids are good. All kids are good, good. No
one is born bad. No one is born a terrorist and I feel very guilty that I
raised my kids in a place that [wasn’t] safe.
I believed that I'm safe. I believed my kids are safe. I
really believed it.
Like, we have this sense of, we want revenge, which is a
horrible, horrible feeling, but I find myself showing my son videos of
houses being bombed in Gaza, because I want to show him that Israel is still
strong. I want to show him that the army is strong—that someone is
protecting us, because he doesn't feel it anymore, and something in his faith
was broken.
It is broken. We don't believe in anyone, anymore. We don't
believe in the country. We don't believe in the army. We don't believe in
ourselves. We don't believe in in Gaza. We don't believe in the world. We don't
believe in anyone who will come to help us, and it's, um, like everything we
believed was shattered in that moment.
I don't want Hamas to exist anymore. I want the . . . the normal, the, the, the good people in Gaza
to rule. I want someone who my country can talk to and uh, right now it, it sounds
like it will never happen . . .
. . . I try to concentrate
on not falling to the revenge—that we feel like we want to [take] revenge. I'm
trying not to focus on that, ‘cuz it's not healthy. It's not going to help my
kids. Nowhere is safe in the world like Israel. Israel is the safest place
for Jews. That's what I believe.
Her daughter was to depart for a class trip to Poland in a
few days. Now, says her mother, Ola
Metzger, the 17-year-old girl won’t need to visit Auschwitz, a rite of
passage for Israeli students. She won’t need an experiential history lesson on
the Holocaust—the girl won’t need it, because she just went through one, a true
Holocaust, right in her home on Kibbutz Nir Oz, so perilously close to Gaza. Ola,
45, used to believe that if we would only alleviate the suffering of the common
people of Gaza, peace would reign.
What Ola learned on October 7, was that peace is not a value
for them. Material wealth is also not so important to them. What is important
to them is their hate. For her, the eye-opener was the destruction, burning
cars, homes, people. They already, had already looted and taken what they wanted,
money, everything, and still it did not satisfy the lust, because the lust is
not for things. The lust is for torturing and murdering Jews [emphasis added].
I told her to hide under the bed because bad guys were out
there shooting all, all over, all around, and all I was thinking [was], “What
happens if they get in?”
I can't believe that these actions are real actions to aim
to free Palestine from someone. I always felt that these people are being
hostages you know, of their own regime, and uh, we always felt that if they
will be okay, if these people will have something to lose, you know, I mean
something to lose, I mean if they have a regular, or more or less regular life
and homes and work and you know, money coming in, and uh, food for their kids .
. . if they will be okay we will be okay, too.
It's very hard to say that I hate someone, but I don't trust
any, anyone now. I, I don't trust them. I can't. We lost so many people, you
know, one out of four in our kibbutz . . .
Um, it was [scary]. I was scared. I was scared and then
sad you know, later on, because how much hate do you have to have? Okay. So you,
okay . . . you came in, you took all the jewelry and you know, and the money,
and the computers and TVs, and whatever, and then you just, you just have to
like ruin everything?
Irit Lahav,
a 57-year-old peace activist from Kibbutz Nir Oz, sustained a serious shock on
October 7. It was then that Lahav realized that the people of Gaza were not
like her, not like normal human beings. Their behavior, well, they do things
Lahav would never dream of doing to anyone, even her most mortal enemy. The
smaller deeds of October 7, even, would be beyond her. She could not have
stolen a wallet, a bike, or a person’s shoes, let alone perpetrate such brutal
acts of violence.
On that day, a border was crossed, all boundaries and norms
of behavior breached. Now the ardent peacenik is no more. Now it is us and “them”
[emphasis added]:
In 2005, when Israel moved out of Gaza, I was very happy.
I thought this, this, is the right thing to do, and I was shocked that 2 months
later, they threw bombs, missiles, at us. What, what the heck is going on? They
just received what they wanted. Why, why is this going on?
Generally speaking, everybody from the kibbutz is very left-minded.
I would say even 100% of the people would really respect the Palestinians
and wish really good things for them and never want to hurt them or do anything
bad toward them. I always saw that they have an equal right like we do, to
have their own country—to be happy, to live peaceful, to be prosperous.
I also volunteered. I would drive the Palestinians who are
very sick, from the border to get treated in Israeli hospitals. Am I thinking
about myself being foolish until now? Maybe. Maybe. But more is that I'm
disappointed at them that they are so cruel, have no values—really lost their
human values.
There is no “Hamas” anymore for me. There is the
Palestinian nation. They are responsible for that, and I think Israel should [let
go] this concept of Hamas being the important people. No. The whole community has
invaded and were brutal and violent.
I think about myself. Would I go to somebody’s house and rob
it and steal their shoes and bicycles and wallets? And no. I wouldn't. Even if
he is my enemy. Even if it's someone that I don't agree with I would not do
that, and if this is not clear to them or to the world that's very sad, really.
What else can we do? What else can we do? I fight for the
peace. We step out from their land. We respect them, you know, and this is what
is going on. Slaughter. Slaughter back.
Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah gave a speech on Wednesday night where he discussed Israel's apparent airstrike against Hamas leader Saleh Arouri in Beirut's southrn suburbs.
He showed his disdain for the Lebanese people whom his party has hijacked..
“Those who think of war with us will, God willing, regret it, and war with us will be costly. So far we have been taking Lebanese interests into consideration, but should war be waged on Lebanon, the Lebanese interests require that we go with the war to the end,” Nasrallah said.
Did he hold a referendum on what Lebanon wants? Is anyone in the Lebanese government outside Hezbollah controlled parties calling for war?
Nope. Iran decides when Lebanese people are disposable and Hezbollah, like Hamas, is digging tunnels underneath them.
“Until now, we have been fighting on the front with controlled calculations and that’s why we are paying a hefty price from the souls of our young men, but if the enemy thinks of waging a war on Lebanon, we will fight without restraint, without rules, without limits and without restrictions,. We do not fear war,” Nasrallah added, from is own heavily fortified bunker deep underneath Lebanon.
Another trope that Nasrallah pushed was that every Israeli has another passport and their suitcase is packed for when things get rough. Which is what all anti-Israel terrorism is based on - the myth that when the going gets tough, most Israelis would flee. It hasn't worked for the past 100 years of terrorism, but this theme is entrenched in Arabic media - every story of a slowdown in immigration, for example, is a headline.
One other point: Just like in Gaza, the Hamas office that as attacked was in "an overcrowded residential area packed with civilians, shops and restaurants." And the airstrike didn't even break the windows of the building next door.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
This brings us to the law of war. The only requirement of proportionality under international law is that when combatants are targeted in areas where civilians are present, the value of the military target must be proportional to the number of anticipated civilian deaths. This highly subjective judgment can’t be the basis of a war-crime prosecution, unless the judgment is utterly unreasonable. The 2-to-1 ratio is not only reasonable, but far better than that achieved by other armed forces facing comparable situations. Thus, were Israel to be prosecuted for violating the principle of proportionality, that would necessarily involve the application of a double standard against the Jewish state.
The charge of genocide made by South Africa is even less persuasive. Real genocides have taken place in the world today, especially in Africa. South Africa has been silent about these neighboring genocides. And it is weakening the term itself by selectively politicizing it against Israel. Gaza has grown in population during the period in which genocide is charged. Israel has provided health care to Gazans in need of Israeli hospitals. It provided high-paying jobs in Israel to thousands of Gazans. These aren’t the actions of a nation engaged in genocide.
Genocide is directed against an entire people, not just criminals and terrorists among them. To accuse Israel of genocide is to fail to distinguish between the legitimate military goal of ending a terrorist organization, such as Hamas, and the illegitimate goal of ending the existence of an entire ethnic or religious group.
The term genocide was coined to describe the Nazi effort to rid the world of all Jews. Accusing Israel of genocide is a form of Holocaust denial, since no one even suggests that Israel has extermination camps, gas chambers, or other mechanisms that exemplified the Holocaust. If Israel were to be found guilty of genocide, the very meaning of that horrible crime would be diluted beyond recognition. It would then apply to the US bombing of Hiroshima, the British bombing of Dresden, and the killing of civilians during the Afghan, Iraqi, and Syrian military actions.
Every civilian death in wartime is a tragedy, and Hamas knew it was signing the death warrants of many civilians when it attacked Israel and then hid its war machinery among Gaza’s civilian population. The death of a human shield is the legal and moral responsibility of those who deliberately placed civilians in harm’s way. Consider the following example: A bank robber starts shooting at customers. When the police arrive, the robber grabs one of the customers and uses her as a human shield. A policeman, in an effort to save the lives of customers, tries to shoot the robber. But the hostage suddenly makes a move, and then the policeman’s bullet hits and kills her. Under the law of every nation, it is the hostage taker, not the policeman who is guilty of killing the hostage, even though the bullet that killed her came from the policeman’s gun.
It is Hamas and its Iranian patrons that should be on trial, not the victims of Hamas barbarism.
US spy agencies verified Israeli claims that Hamas and another Palestinian terrorist group used Shifa Hospital in Gaza City as a command center and to hold hostages, The New York Times reported on Tuesday.
In late November, the Israel Defense Forces released extensive video evidence of terror tunnels under Shifa Hospital—the Gaza Strip's largest medical facility—saying it “unequivocally" proves the modus operandi of Hamas, "which systematically operates from hospitals.”
The terrorist group held at least three of the estimated 240 hostages it kidnapped on October 7 at Shifa, the IDF said.
Nevertheless, critics continued to claim that the IDF had little evidence Hamas used the hospital as a command post.
"In the weeks since the operation, news organizations have continued to raise questions about Hamas’s presence at the hospital. And health and humanitarian organizations have criticized the Israeli operation. A humanitarian team led by the World Health Organization, which visited Al-Shifa immediately after Israeli forces stormed the hospital, called it a 'death zone,'" the Times reported.
But a senior US intelligence official said Tuesday that the American government was convinced that Hamas used the hospital complex to direct terrorist forces, store weapons and hold “at least a few hostages.”
The official also said US spy agencies had information that Hamas destroyed evidence before the IDF operation at the hospital got underway.
Hamas terrorists took measures to prepare for the IDF's November raid of Shifa Hospital in Gaza by destroying documents and transferring hostages to an alternate location, according to intelligence documents obtained by The New York Times.
The report said that US intelligence found that Hamas destroyed technology and documents crucial to the organization's operation, with Shifa hospital as a home base.
US intelligence sources emphasized that Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad used the hospital as a command center for terrorists in the field fighting against Israeli forces. This intelligence assessment was conducted after Israel insisted that Hamas had built a huge military compound under the hospital – which, according to the report, had become a "legitimate military target for Israel."
Hostages not located, but remains found nearby
While inside the hospital complex, the IDF did not find hostages but did find an arsenal of weapons behind medical equipment. The bodies of two murdered hostages were found surrounding the complex.
The IDF's findings at the Shifa hospital grounds indicated use of the space as a military compound, uncovering meters of tunnels complete with living rooms, kitchenettes, toilets, and other infrastructure.
The route of the tunnel, revealed after the shaft seen in the photographs published by the IDF spokesperson, passes under the building of the Qatari hospital located in the Shifa complex and is lined with electricity and communication infrastructure throughout.
(Guest post from someone who prefers to remain anonymous)
Various departments and programs within the University of Illinois (UIUC), including Women & Gender in Global Perspectives (WGGP) and the Initiative in Holocaust, Genocide, and Memory Studies (HGMS), have gone through extreme and sometimes dishonest lengths in order to repeatedly propagate pro Hamas voices from some of the most notorious and vile propagandists, and to avoid allowing any alternative voices, since October 7th.
Here are some examples:
On October 27th, WGGP and HGMS (along with the Center for South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies) hosted a “Teach-in” panel with Josh Ruebner (who was recently Managing Director of American Muslims for Palestine and the Policy Director for US Campaign for Palestinian Rights), Hasan Ayoub (Al-Najah National University in Nablus/Member of Global Network on Question of Palestine), and anti-Zionist Israeli Ayelet Ben-Yishai (University of Haifa). As will be a running theme, the session consisted strictly of lies, misrepresentations, and double standards geared toward condemnation for Israel.
On November 8th, Zachary Foster (ubiquitous pro-Hamas historian at unaccredited Academia.edu) led a “Gaza Teach In” sponsored by WGGP. It was entirely a twisted historical backgrounder on Hamas and rationalization for recent and current Hamas activities.
WGGP was approached by locals and staff requesting a balanced panel that offers perspectives from both sides. WGGP agreed to sponsor, in collaboration with HGMS, a panel on December 7th that would consist of Israeli Professor Yifat Bitton and Palestinian activity Hyam Tannous (former Senior Supervisor in Counseling for Women Wage Peace). Promotional material was drawn up (see below) for these two to discuss, but without the knowledge of the panelists or others, WGGP invited 2 additional (and notorious) Palestinian panelists, Susan Abulhawa and Laila El-Haddad, who are both known for supporting terror (Abulhawa has repeatedly celebrated October 7th). The original panelists and those who solicited WGGP for a balanced panel found out about the additional activists only when new promotional material was added. Disappointing as this was, those wanting a voice for Israel were still content to go through in order to have a voice heard. But then Abulhawa sent a letter refusing to participate on a panel with a Zionist. It’s unclear whether El-Haddad was still intending to participate. In any case, instead of following through with the event as planned, WGGP canceled it. When locals objected, WGGP responded to each person with a form letter that stated WGGP and HGMS couldn’t hold the event due to “an incredibly complex series of events which led to one of the panelists canceling.” WGGP then suggested reaching out to Jewish orgs CUJF and Hillel to host an event. Would they suggest Palestinians go to their local Muslim orgs to host an event? Ultimately, they were not willing to allow an Israeli voice unless it was almost entirely drowned out by extreme voices in support of Hamas terror.
·In addition, a panel event was organized by Graduate Employee Organization (GEO) under the title, “A Panel to understand the historical roots of recent events in Palestine and Israel.” The audience included some pro-Israel students and community members who were hoping for a dialogue. According to a number of attendees, the panel never referenced the October 7th massacre or the hostages, which apparently were not part of “recent events in Palestine and Israel.” Instead, the following were some key comments:
ØProf. Augustus Wood (, Labor and Employment Relations, UIUC):
-“This violence (of Hamas) is not merely strategic in their war for liberation, but also a cleansing of oneself, of anxieties, of the occupation, of exploitation.”
-“Despite what the propaganda is saying, none of this violence (of the Hamas) is unprovoked.”
-“The armed resistance (Hamas) should not be referred to in crude inhumane terms such as terrorists.”
-“The US and Israel began to publicize Hamas’s calls for truce and new borders for a free Palestine as anti Jewish, essentially creating a new weaponized form of antisemitism, to demonize anybody who calls for independence.”
-“The state of Israel proved their worth, and the US swept in (to Israel) like the vampire it is, to extract as many resources as possible.”
-“We need to dismantle the oppression, and put the humanity back in the discussion.”
ØSara Hijab (SJP):
-“Herzl chose Palestine for various reasons. All those reasons go back to anti-Arab rhetoric and bigotry.”
-“I hope you realize the evil that Zionism is, and that it has no place anywhere in the world.”
-“Israel has no interest in creating a safe haven for Jews. It only sees it for its financial gain, as does America.”
-“We must all become anti-Zionists, the world needs nothing short of that”
ØJustin Holmes (PhD Candidate, Dept. of Sociology, UIUC)
-“When we say “from the river to the sea,” we are not talking about genocide, or ethnic cleansing. We are talking about the elimination of a dominating structure and the equal protection and the enjoinment of rights and privileges.”
ØProf. Corinna Mullin (John Jay College, CUNY - Labor for Palestine)
-“In Gaza the armed resistance refuses to submit to Israel’s designs for ethnic cleansing.”
-“It’s amazing how in their statements and resolutions and protests, students are unapologetic about the Palestinian national liberation by any means necessary.”
ØProf. Bikrum Singh Gill (Political Science, Virginia tech):
-“We need to begin by strongly and loudly saying that currently Israel is conducting a genocide in Gaza.”
-“There is a genocide happening, and the Palestinian armed resistance is fighting against this genocide”
-“We need to be very clear: On one side we have a genocidal war. On the other side we have armed resistance against genocide, against colonization, which is essentially a liberation war. There are 2 wars right now – the war of genocide, and the war of liberation.”
-“As we formulate tactics and strategies to oppose this genocidal war, it’s imperative that we do not throw the armed resistance under the bus in Palestine.”
-“We cannot play the game that the Zionists are playing, trying to distinguish between the so called humanitarian civilian space and the political power of the armed resistance in Palestine.”
-“What the armed resistance in Palestine is challenging is the primal, the fundamental equation that underpins colonialism.”
-“I heard the first speaker speak about violence and the way it can be cathartic and a means to decolonize, but there is also a much more direct purpose to armed resistance, as it hits at the core, at the heart of colonial power.”
-“From southern Lebanon, Hezbollah uses armed struggle to end the occupation from southern Lebanon.”
The moderator concluded, saying that: “We heard of the role of the armed resistance in fighting a war against genocide, a war of liberation, even that terminology is just extremely important. I appreciated the analysis of the root causes of the problem, and provided historical context of Zionism I think was particularly important”.
Local supporters of Israel raised questions regarding the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Arab countries, and noted that many Jews lived in Israel for generations. They asked the panel if it would denounce Hamas, and whether the panel seeks a peaceful and equal solution (something Hamas does not seek). And they asked why the organizer of the panel did not offer any alternative voices other than those siding with Hamas. And finally, they asked why events of October 7th were not mentioned.
The panel answered as follows:
-Jews were not cleansed from Arab countries (and that it is propaganda to say so).
-“What happened on October 7th did not happen in a vacuum. It did not start any new war, any new deaths. Palestinians have been relentlessly murdered and relentlessly bombed since 1948 and so we should talk about what happened before October 7th. The reason why Hamas launched their reaction is because Jewish settlers went and harassed Muslim worshipers in their mosque, in one of the holiest sites for Muslims.”
When pressed on what happened on October 7th, the response was:
-“On October 7th, Hamas went and made paragliders, and then flew to where Israelis were holding a concert, a festival, right next to Gaza, an open air prison. They took Israeli settlers as political pieces, to exchange for all the Palestinian prisoners who are wrongfully imprisoned with no basis.”
The panel stopped the discussion when asked how many were murdered on October 7th, and whether a 9 months-old baby is a political prisoner. They did not answer the questions about the composition of the panel, and reiterated that Hamas should be referenced only in terms that make clear it represents justified armed resistance.
Beyond this, the Jerusalem Post published a story of another Jewish UIUC student who attended an interfaith dinner wearing her Jewish star necklace and one of the men said he refuses to sit next to a Jew.
There is a serious problem at UIUC.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
Gisha is an Israeli not-for-profit organization, founded in 2005, whose goal is to protect the freedom of movement of Palestinians, especially Gaza residents. Gisha promotes rights guaranteed by international and Israeli law.
Since the 1967 occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, Israel’s military has developed a complex system of rules and sanctions to control the movement of the 4.5 million Palestinians who live there. The restrictions violate the fundamental right of Palestinians to freedom of movement. As a result, additional basic rights are violated, including the right to life, the right to access medical care, the right to education, the right to livelihood, the right to family unity and the right to freedom of religion.
If we take them at their word, then Gisha must be incensed that Egypt has built a huge new wall to block Gazans from fleeing, and that both Egypt and Jordan have insisted that they will not allow any Gazans to take refuge in their countries.
But Gisha, whose very purpose is to allow Palestinians to have freedom of movement, has not said a word about this. They've called for a ceasefire and for more aid to Gaza, but nothing demanding that Gazans who want to leave be given that option. Which is a strange position for an NGO that is dedicated to freedom of movement to take.
This is par for the course for Gisha. They hardly ever have said anything negative about Hamas restrictions on movement, and in previous times that Egypt prevented people from coming from Gaza Gisha blamed - Israel!
Neither has any other human rights group demanded freedom of movement for Gazans to anywhere but Israel. No calls from Amnesty, or Human Rights Watch, or Oxfam to open Egypt's and Jordan's borders to refugees. UNRWA, whose entire purpose is to help Palestinian "refugees," does not want to help any of these Palestinian refugees who want to leave a war zone. They could easily welcome Gazans in Jordanian - or even West Bank - camps if they wanted to.
Nothing on this issue from the Refugee Rights website. The International Rescue Committee is not advocating for the rights of Gazans to take refuge elsewhere should they choose to.
And now it isn't only Jordan and Egypt, but the Palestinian Authority as well.
I had reported on a proposed "humanitarian corridor" by sea that Cyprus has proposed to bring aid to Gaza, which Israel approved. - but the PA rejected it. On Tuesday, PA president Mahmoud Shtayyeh gave his reasons for this rejection to the Greek consul: "stressing the complete rejection of the waterway that Cyprus talks about under the slogan of transporting aid to the Gaza Strip for fear that the ships will displace our people out of the Strip."
This is a remarkable statement. The PA could simply tell Cyprus that they approve the aid with the condition that no Palestinians be allowed to leave on those ships. If we take Shtayyeh at his word, he is saying that it is better that Gaza forego desperately needed aid completely rather than even having the theoretical possibility of Gazans fleeing via the boats that bring aid.
The people who pretend to care about Palestinian lives - Egypt, Jordan, NGOs, pro-Palestinian advocacy groups, and even the PA itself - are all dead set against allowing any Gazans from leaving Gaza.
Egypt has allowed hundreds of thousands of refugees from other Arab countries. So has Jordan. They specifically exclude Palestinians. And not one NGO has said a negative word about this discrimination. Why not?
Who, exactly, is making Gaza into an "open-air prison" nowadays?
Human rights is not what these NGOs care about. Attacking Israel is.
Buy the EoZ book, PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism today at Amazon!
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424.
This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For over 19 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.
Weekend long read
-
1) At Foreign Affairs, Matthew Levitt explains ‘What Hamas Wants in Postwar
Gaza’. “In seeking to force a new governance structure on Gaza and...
The pos...
Weekend long read
-
1) At Foreign Affairs, Matthew Levitt explains ‘What Hamas Wants in Postwar
Gaza’. “In seeking to force a new governance structure on Gaza and...
The pos...
Revisiting “From The River to the Sea”
-
[image: Revisiting “From The River to the Sea”]
The Australian senate has overwhelmingly condemned the phrase “from the
river to the sea, Palestine will be...
The ethnic cleansing no-one tells you about
-
More young Jews seem to be challenging the false narrative that Jews are
white colonial settlers from Europe. This video not only makes the point
that most...
The Jewish Cordoba
-
I have blogged multiple times here on what I see as a parallel between the
conflict between Catholics and Moslems over the Cordoba Cathedral and that
of ...
Hamas in America
-
[image: Dry Bones cartoon, Biden, Pro-Palestinian demonstrations, Hamas,
Bibi, Jewish, Israel, Oct 7, Jews, Israel, Rafah, Gaza,]
We should have seen it c...
Jonathan Sacks – Faith After the Holocaust
-
Jonathan Sacks – Faith After the Holocaust IsraelSeen.com
Jonathan Sacks – Faith After the Holocaust Faith After the Holocaust Rabbi
Sacks responds to the ...
Yom Hashoah 5784 – 2024
-
Israel’s Yom Hashoah began at sundown this evening with the annual ceremony
at Yad Vashem with torches lit in memory of the 6 million Jewish victims of
the...
The Palestinian “Two-State” Plan: Duping the West
-
One of the great unsolved mysteries of the 21st century is why, given what
a catastrophe it proved to be, anyone, much less a whole phalanx of
politicians,...
Closing Jews Down Under Website
-
With a heavyish heart I am closing down the website after ten years.
It is and it isn’t an easy decision after 10 years of constant work. The
past...
‘Test & Trace’ is a mirage
-
Lockdown II thoughts: Day 1 Opposition politicians have been banging on
about the need for a ‘working’ Test & Trace system even more loudly than
the govern...
Thursday, January 04, 2024
Elder of Ziyon
