Tuesday, July 07, 2026

From Ian:

Why Entebbe Wouldn’t be Celebrated Today
Zionism, once understood by many as the national liberation movement of the Jewish people, had become, in much of Western discourse, synonymous with colonialism, racism and oppression. The Jewish homeland became the Jewish oppressor, while Jewish self-defence became uniquely suspect.

After the deadliest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, many Jews found themselves accused not because they celebrated murder, but because they celebrated rescue.

Think about that for a moment.

More Jews were murdered on 7 October than on any day since the Holocaust, hundreds more were kidnapped, families watched parents, children and grandparents dragged into Gaza to face torture, sexual violence and captivity.

Yet the expectation placed upon Israel by much of the international community was unlike that demanded of almost any other democracy. If rescuing your own citizens risks too many civilian casualties because terrorists have embedded themselves among civilians, then perhaps your citizens should remain where they are.

That expectation would have been unimaginable in 1976.

The Jewish state was created because Jewish history had demonstrated, catastrophically, what happens when Jews lack both sovereignty and the means to defend themselves. After the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, many seemed to believe that lesson should be forgotten.

Entebbe taught the world that Jews would never again be abandoned. Nuseirat revealed how many people now believed they should have been.

This is not an argument against criticising Israel. Criticise governments, criticise military strategy, criticise political leaders. Every democracy should expect that scrutiny. It is, however, an argument against changing the moral principles by which democracies are judged.

Because if we conclude that the rescue of hostages becomes illegitimate simply because terrorists have made the rescue sufficiently costly, then we hand every terrorist organisation in the world a blueprint.

Hide behind civilians, kidnap innocents, raise the price of rescue. Wait for democracies to decide that saving their own people is no longer worth the condemnation.

Fifty years ago, the world looked at Entebbe and saw a democracy refusing to abandon its citizens. Almost fifty years later, much of the world looked at Nuseirat and asked whether those citizens should have been rescued at all.

Fifty years ago, Israel was admired because it refused to abandon Jews. Today, it is too often condemned for refusing to abandon them.

The operation changed remarkably little. It was the world that changed.
Israel urges WHO to condemn Hamas over press conference at Gaza hospital
Israel’s mission in Geneva on Monday called on the World Health Organization to denounce Hamas after the terrorist group held a press conference outside a hospital in the Gaza Strip.

“Hamas held a press conference today at Shuhada al-Aqsa Hospital in Gaza,” the mission wrote on X, using the Arabic name for the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza.

“Any silence on Hamas’ exploitation of the hospital for propaganda will be a choice,” it continued, tagging the WHO and its director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

“Al-Shifa, Nasser, and Kamal Adwan Hospitals, all have been abused by Hamas to hide terrorists and weapons, cynically and brazenly. They used them as terror hubs to hide and torture hostages. And now they use a hospital as a stage for propaganda,” the post added. “With each step, WHO’s silence is so much more deafening.”

The press conference was held outside the emergency department of Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital on Monday afternoon by Ismail Thawabta, head of Hamas’s “government” media office, and Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem.

Thawabta and Qassem announced that Hamas was dissolving one of the key “civilian” bodies through which it administers Gaza, while saying employees would remain in their posts, in what appeared to be a largely symbolic move.

An Israeli official told Kan News public broadcaster that the purported resignation of the Hamas government, while all of its members remain in office, was “a spin that means absolutely nothing.”
A Turning Point in a Parking Lot
A single nighttime photo from October 17, 2023 exposed the Hamas playbook and Al Jazeera’s role in laundering it through global media and human rights organizations. It was the first consequential press event for Palestinians since October 7 and was a turning point in the war.

The photo is the choreographed scene broadcast live from Al-Shifa hospital in the immediate aftermath of an explosion at the nearby Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital. The Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health claimed that 500 Palestinians were killed in a “targeted” Israeli airstrike of the 80-bed hospital in Gaza City just two hours before.

It was a lie.

An errant rocket fired by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) landed among a dense crowd of Palestinian civilians seeking shelter in the hospital parking lot. The bodies from Al-Ahli Baptist were rushed to a press conference at Gaza’s largest hospital, where they knew international media were already stationed and ready.

The shrouded bodies are presumably real. But note the unidentified young man in front of the podium posing with a dead infant still in its bloodied clothing. Note the second young man holding the corpse of a young girl.

This was not merely a press conference. It was macabre theatre for a global audience that was in denial about the mass atrocities Hamas perpetrated only ten days prior.

It was an attempt to stop the war while Hamas still held 240 hostages and before Israeli ground forces could enter the Strip to rescue them and stop the incessant rocket fire.

While it failed to halt Israel's offensive, this is the event that crystallized the "Israel bombs hospitals" narrative and that primed audiences for the rapid spread of the genocide libel.

At the press conference, Dr. Abu-Sittah said:
“Every western politician who has declared unconditional support for Israel’s war effort on the Palestinian people has the blood of these children on their hands. That unconditional support is what led us to this massacre… no other country feels free to target hospitals and get away with it. What happened today is a war crime.”


UKLFI: Natasha Hausdorff discusses Norway's proposed trade ban and the latest UN report targeting Israel
Norway's government has proposed a ban on trade with areas of Israeli settlement in East Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. A new UN report claims Israel deliberately targeted children in Gaza. Natasha Hausdorff, Legal Director of UKLFI Charitable Trust, discusses the issues with Henrik Beckheim.

Natasha is a barrister and expert commentator on international law, including the law of armed conflict, foreign affairs and national security policy. She holds an MA in law from Oxford University and an LLM from Tel Aviv University, focussing on public international law and the law of armed conflict. She clerked for Miriam Naor, President of Israel's Supreme Court, and was a fellow at Columbia Law School's National Security programme.

Natasha’s work explaining legal issues relating to Israel has been recognised by the American Jewish Committee’s award for moral courage and by the honour of lighting one of the torches on Har Herzl to mark Israel’s Independence Day.


Khaled Abu Toameh: The Real Reason the Palestinians Are Fighting to Save UNRWA
Unlike the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), which seeks durable solutions by resettling refugees and helping them rebuild their lives, UNRWA has institutionalized refugee status across generations.

Instead of solving the refugee problem, UNRWA's function is to perpetuate it.

Many Palestinians fled the country during the 1948 war, which five Arab armies waged on Israel and lost, then were refused entry back into Israel because they had not been loyal. For Palestinians, UNRWA has become the international symbol of their demand that the remaining Palestinian refugees of 1948 and millions of their descendants be allowed to settle inside Israel. Does anyone think that this time they would be more loyal?

The Palestinian insistence on the unrealistic "right of return" therefore remains one of the principal obstacles to any peace agreement.

According to a detailed report published by the Israel Defense Forces, at least 1,462 of UNRWA's 12,521 employees in the Gaza Strip... are members of Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), or other terrorist organizations.

The report further states that Hamas systematically exploited UNRWA facilities by constructing terror tunnels beneath schools, storing weapons, establishing command centers, and launching rockets from areas adjacent to UN facilities.

Instead of helping Palestinians move beyond a perpetual claim to refugee status, UNRWA appears committed to sustaining the conflict's central illusion: that Israel will one day absorb millions of Palestinians and thereby cease to exist as a Jewish state.

The "Board of Peace" is therefore correct in arguing that UNRWA has no place in the future Gaza Strip.

If Arab leaders genuinely care about the welfare of their Palestinian brethren, they should insist that Hamas lay down its weapons and relinquish control of the Gaza Strip.

The Trump Administration should insist that any future arrangement for Gaza exclude UNRWA and replace it with mechanisms that promote rehabilitation rather than dependency.

Most importantly, it is time for Palestinian leaders to abandon the fantasy of the "right of return." These leaders are lying to their own people by telling them that one day they will return to their families' former homes inside Israel.

So long as UNRWA continues to institutionalize that dream, it will remain part of the problem rather than part of the solution.

If the goal is a different future for the Gaza Strip – one based on reconstruction, coexistence, and stability rather than perpetual conflict – then eliminating UNRWA and replacing it with a new institution – one not obstructed by past conflicts of interest – is not only justified. It is long overdue.
UNRWA failed to implemented UN-recommended antisemitism, violent speech reforms, IMPACT-se finds
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) has failed to implement hate speech and antisemitism-related reforms recommended by an UNRWA-established Independent Review Group, according to an IMPACT-se analysis published on Thursday.

The Independent Review Group, led by former French foreign minister Catherine Colonna and known as the Colonna Report, was ordered in 2024 following public outcry over concerns about UNRWA's teaching materials, staff conduct, and ties to Hamas.

Colonna found that much of UNRWA’s educational materials “constitute a grave violation of neutrality” and ordered the agency “stop using such material,” along with 49 other recommendations.

Many donor nations temporarily froze funding for UNRWA in light of the findings, with the resumption of donations conditional on implementing Colonna’s recommendations.

IMPACT-se analyzed UNRWA progress reports, funding requests, statements, and teaching materials between April 2024 and May 2026 to assess UNRWA’s implementation.

Eighth-grade textbook glorified suicide bombings
The analysis found that UNRWA not only failed to meaningfully implement many of Colonna’s recommendations but also lowered the threshold for considering recommendations complete.

UNRWA additionally revised its reporting methodology, which, according to IMPACT-se, led to the appearance of “a substantially accelerated rate of implementation.”

For example, one of the Colonna Report’s recommendations required UNRWA to immediately stop using teaching materials containing incitement to violence, hate speech, and antisemitism. Upon analyzing UNRWA textbooks, IMPACT-se found continued use of textbooks that glorify violence and terrorism.

One eighth-grade Arabic language textbook contains reading comprehension, grammar, and vocabulary exercises that praise the slashing of Israelis’ throats and glorify suicide bombings.

Another of Colonna’s recommendations required that UNRWA review the content of textbooks with Israel and the Palestinian Authority. According to IMPACT-se, Israel was not invited to participate in any review despite UNRWA reporting that the recommendation was completed.


Hamas move to dissolve Gaza governance ‘means nothing,’ diplomatic source says
A diplomatic source familiar with the U.S.-led Board of Peace dismissed on Monday Hamas’ announcement that it intends to dissolve its governing role in Gaza after 19 years, saying the move “means nothing.”

“It shows that Hamas is under pressure; they’re cornered,” the source told JNS. “So what they’re trying to say is, ‘Look, we’re not the problem, we’re not the one saying no. The technocratic committee can come in, take over our bankrupt economy, our broken services, our mountains of debt and all of our problems, and we’ll just keep our weapons and keep power.’”

Hamas’s Government Media Office said the designated terrorist organization is prepared to hand over administrative control of Gaza to a Palestinian technocratic body under the Board of Peace framework, known as the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, intended to serve as a transitional governing authority.

However, the statement made no mention of Hamas’s disarmament, a central condition of the U.S.-brokered Israel-Hamas ceasefire agreement that took effect in January.

According to the source, Hamas is attempting to shift responsibility onto the international community while avoiding the core requirements of the agreement, which include a sequenced process of disarmament, deployment of an international security force, installation of the NCAG and a formal transfer of authority.

“What they’re trying to do is more of a sham,” the source told JNS, accusing Hamas of wanting “to shovel off the sh*t, which is taking care of people and actually providing electricity and water. They want to hand over that and keep power and money.”

The source also said Hamas is struggling to pay the government employee salaries, adding, “We can do it, but we’re not paying the salaries of a Hamas state. We’ll pay the salaries when they hand over authority and transfer to the NCAG.”

If it’s not a game that Hamas is playing, and they are serious about a governing transition, “they can prove it by signing the sequencing agreement,” the source told JNS.

“If they come around next week, sign the agreement on how to disarm and give up their tunnels and give up their light and heavy weapons and hand over authority properly, then great,” the source said. “But what we’re seeing is instead they’re trying to position themselves through the media and through announcements that they’re doing these wonderful steps that in practice don’t mean anything.”

The Board of Peace aims to “move fast on some things,” including pilot projects to construct shelters outside Hamas control, to be gradually expanded under the protection of a multinational security force that would replace the Israel Defense Forces in those areas.


How Morocco's Religious Rehabilitation Model Could Help Gaza
Morocco's experience with deradicalization programming suggests it could play a role in rehabilitating Gaza's institutions after years of Hamas rule. Over the past two decades, Rabat has developed a state-led religious system that combines closely regulated clerical training and community outreach. These programs merit consideration because they address both the rehabilitation of violent religious extremists and a wide array of necessary administrative and training functions. Moreover, Morocco has substantial experience coordinating with the Israeli government and engaging with local Palestinian actors.

The kingdom's current religious framework grew out of the 2003 Casablanca bombings. Officials traced the bombers to extremist Salafi jihadist preachers in impoverished districts. Authorities concluded that weak government oversight had allowed extremist preachers and al-Qaeda-linked networks to spread their messages through mosques and religious schools, gain influence over local religious institutions, recruit vulnerable young people, and foment conflict.

In response, Rabat moved quickly to enhance state involvement in this sector. Authorities placed all mosques under the Ministry of Islamic Affairs, which now appoints and licenses all imams and controls mosque funding and religious endowment revenue. Today, every preacher must complete a government-sponsored training program and pass an official exam.

The government also rewrote school Quran classes and sermon guides to focus on Morocco's Maliki Islamic tradition of tolerance and national unity, rather than on scriptural passages that could be twisted toward violence. In 2015, the king opened the Mohammed VI Institute in Rabat to train hundreds of imams and religious guides under this unified, moderate curriculum.

In addition, Rabat operates a separate but connected program focusing on state-certified male and female religious guides who work in mosques, schools, prisons, and local communities. They meet with families, counsel young people, answer religious questions, and promote interpretations of Islam that reject violence and other extremist ideas.

Polls have long indicated that religion is central to Gaza's social and political life. Post-Hamas governance cannot simply remove religion from public life; Gaza remains overwhelmingly Muslim, and Palestinian Basic Law names Islam as the state religion. Yet it can constrain officials' use of religion as a political weapon - which is exactly what Morocco's model is built to do, and why its experience is potentially useful here.

Of particular value is the administrative machinery behind its model: a clerical licensing system, a standardized curriculum that emphasizes tolerance and moderation, a sermon-vetting process, and a training pipeline. The kingdom's role would be to train Palestinian clerics and administrators to run the system themselves - the same approach Rabat already uses with clergy in Tunisia and Mali.
JPost Editorial: US should strengthen Middle East allies, not give F-35s to regional stability threats
The United States should not provide Turkey with F-35 fighter jets or advanced fighter engines, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday, warning that such a move would upset the regional balance of power and threaten Israeli air superiority in the Middle East.

Speaking on Fox & Friends, he said Turkey is “a great country” but is governed by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whom he accused of calling for Israel’s annihilation, occupying part of Cyprus, threatening Greece, backing Hamas, and allowing the influence of the Muslim Brotherhood to shape Turkish policy.

The balance of power in the Middle East is ultimately protected by Israel’s air superiority and America’s posture in the region, Netanyahu said.

His warning came as US President Donald Trump heads to Ankara for this week’s NATO summit, where Erdogan is expected to press for renewed access to the F-35 program and relief from US sanctions. Turkey was removed from the F-35 program in 2019 after buying Russia’s S-400 air-defense system, which Washington said could compromise the aircraft’s stealth technology.

Erdogan’s record gives Israel reason to be alarmed
Erdogan’s record gives Israel every reason to be alarmed. Since the October 7 massacre, he has called Hamas “a liberation group,” said Israel is a “terror state,” compared Netanyahu to Hitler, and said Turkey could “enter Israel” as it had entered Libya and Nagorno-Karabakh. In March 2025, during Eid al-Fitr remarks, he prayed that “Zionist Israel” be “destroyed and devastated.”

This is not normal diplomatic criticism. It is the language of a leader who sees the Jewish state as an enemy to be defeated, humiliated, and ultimately removed.

Israel has heard this kind of language before. Iran has spent decades promising a world without Israel. Erdogan’s Turkey is not Iran, but when a NATO leader publicly prays for Israel’s destruction and supports Hamas after the October 7 massacre, Israelis are right to take him literally.

Trump should tell Erdogan today that the F-35 is off the table.
Sa’ar says Turkish FM’s remarks a ‘clear call for genocide’
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’aron Monday accused his Turkish counterpart of making a “clear call for genocide,” condemning recent rhetoric as a dangerous escalation of dehumanization.

Speaking in Jerusalem alongside Rwandan Foreign Minister Olivier Nduhungirehe, Sa’ar responded to Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan’s description of the Jewish state as a “burden that humanity can no longer bear.” Sa’ar warned that framing a people as a problem for humanity echoes historical language that preceded widespread atrocities.

“The Jewish people know very well what happens when such words are allowed to go unchallenged,” Sa’ar said, noting that Turkey is slated to host a NATO summit on Tuesday. “The first step on the road to genocide is dehumanization.”

Following the diplomatic remarks, Sa’ar and Nduhungirehe signed bilateral agreements to advance cooperation in education, vocational training and international development.


German FM backs Israel after Turkish counterpart’s ‘genocide incitement’ remarks
On Sunday, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul condemned recent remarks by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan against Israel, following a call by Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar.

Sa’ar called on NATO leaders to condemn what he described as Fidan’s “sickening” remarks, calling them “clear incitement to genocide" on Friday.

“Dehumanizing the Jewish people and presenting it as an ‘unbearable burden’ is the classic language of the great oppressors in history,” Sa’ar said. “The enlightened world and Turkey’s NATO allies must unequivocally condemn this explicit call for Israel’s destruction.”

Wadephul said that “the recent statements by the Turkish foreign minister against Israel are clearly unacceptable. Israel faces an ongoing threat in the region, and it has the right and duty to defend its citizens.”

Wadephul is scheduled to visit Israel on Tuesday and meet with Sa’ar, before continuing to a NATO meeting.


Masses accompany Khamenei funeral procession through Tehran as throngs chant for revenge
A sea of mourners dressed in black flooded into Iran’s capital Monday for a procession as part of the funeral of the late Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, with throngs of people calling for the death of US President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Khamenei’s flag-draped coffin, and those of members of his family killed in a February 28 airstrike at the start of the war launched by Israel and the United States, sat on board a truck decorated to resemble the ornamental grating that surrounds the shrine of an imam. The massive turnout, encouraged by Iran’s theocracy as a sign of strength, came as it negotiates with the US over a permanent end to the war that killed the 86-year-old cleric who ruled Iran for decades.

Helicopter images aired on Iranian state television showed a huge crowd stretching from Tehran’s Azadi Square for miles down a multilane street of the same name.

The crowd appeared to be larger than the one that turned out for the 2020 procession for the late Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force Gen. Qassem Solemani, which drew over 1 million people.

Authorities offered no immediate crowd count as the truck, covered in flower petals, crept down the street.

“Today that we are here for the funeral for our leader, it’s a very tough day,” mourner Fatima Hassan said. “We are not here to say goodbye to him, we are here for revenge. And we will take revenge.”

An effigy of Trump being hanged was seen along the funeral procession’s route.

Mourners reached out to touch the truck, and some threw scarves and other items for attendants to brush against the coffin, a common practice in Iran seen as a blessing. Attendants, some on the ladders of firetrucks, sprayed misted water across the crowds to cool them in the heat.


Iran fires missiles at two commercial ships in Strait of Hormuz, causing major damage
Iran fired at least two missiles at commercial ships transiting through the Strait of Hormuz, Axios reported late Monday night, citing a US official.

According to the report, both ships were damaged significantly, but there were no casualties.

Shortly before the report, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations agency (UKMTO) stated that a tanker was hit by an unknown projectile while traveling about eight nautical miles (14.8 km) east of Oman's Limah, causing a fire.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has warned ships in recent days to remain on Iranian-designated routes rather than the US-designated route near the coast of Oman.

"Our missiles and drones are ready to fire at you," the IRGC told ships over the weekend, the Wall Street Journal reported.

One of the ships may be a Qatari gas tanker
One of the ships appeared to be Al Rekayyat, a Qatari gas tanker.

Early on Tuesday, a crew member on a ship near Al Rekayyat heard a message from the ship stating that it had been hit on the port side, at the top of the engine room, according to a recording shared with the WSJ.

"Engine room fire and full of smoke. Unable to assess further damage. All crew are safe and mustered on the starboard side," the WSJ cited the recording as saying.
IDF strikes five terrorists in northern Gaza
The Israel Defense Forces struck five terrorists in northern Gaza, killing at least one, the military said on Monday.

The incident, which occurred over the weekend, was triggered by the operatives’ attempt to restore underground terrorist infrastructure west of the Yellow Line, the army said.

The IDF holds roughly 60% of Gaza’s territory, east to the Yellow Line that runs through the Strip.

The Israeli military named Hudhayfah Hussein Abdullah al-Hawajri, a Nukhba terrorist in Hamas’s East Jabalia Battalion, as the terrorist killed in the strike, adding that the other four were hit.

“Prior to the strike, steps were taken to mitigate harm to civilians, including the use of precise munitions and aerial surveillance,” the IDF said.

On Sunday, the IDF said it killed, in separate strikes the previous week, Muhammad Najib Ashour, a Nukhba Force platoon commander, and Tamer Saeed Abu Nakhal, a cell commander in Hamas’s “military wing,” for their involvement in the advancement of attacks on Israeli soldiers.


The Sanity Interview: Brian L. Cox
In this interview we spoke with Dr. Brian L. Cox, an expert in international law, about the state of war today. We discussed when a war is legal, the credibility of bodies like the ICC and ICJ, the genocide accusation against Israel, and the rationale for America's and Israel's attack on Iran.


Unapologetically Jewish: Debunking Genocide Claims in the Israel-Hamas Conflict with John Spencer
In this episode, John Spencer, an expert on urban warfare and retired U.S. Army officer, discusses the complexities of urban warfare, the misuse of the term 'genocide,' and the importance of understanding the facts and context behind civilian casualties in Gaza and Israel.

Urban warfare challenges in Gaza
Legal definition and misuse of 'genocide'
Civilian vs. combatant casualties
Israel's military tactics and civilian protection
The impact of misinformation and propaganda in war

Chapters
00:00 Understanding Genocide: Definitions and Misuse
05:32 Civilian Casualties: The Numbers Game
11:37 Urban Warfare: Challenges and Strategies
17:18 The Role of Media in Shaping Perceptions
23:09 The Ethics of Warfare: Intent vs. Impact
28:52 Fighting for Truth: The Challenge Ahead




The Jerusalem Post: What Iran's prisons do to women who resist
Jailed for 804 days in Iran on false spying charges, academic Dr. Kylie Moore-Gilbert refused the Revolutionary Guard's offer of freedom, if she'd spy for them.

In this Jerusalem Post interview, Moore-Gilbert describes surviving IRGC detention and Iran's public prison system, being stripped of her identity down to a number, and holding on to who she was as an act of defiance: "I just didn't break." She explains how the Guards blackmail and recruit prisoners, why she insists ordinary Iranians are nothing like the regime that rules them, and where she believes the country goes from here.

A Middle East scholar and author of the memoir The Uncaged Sky, Moore-Gilbert is now one of the most prominent voices against "hostage diplomacy." Her read on the current moment is bleak, "the regime thinks that it won", and she warns the West against easing the economic pressure she sees as the regime's greatest vulnerability. Her message to Iranian women right now is sombre: lay low and wait.

Chapters
00:00 - Who is Kylie Moore-Gilbert: jailed in Iran for espionage
00:48 - What it meant to be imprisoned as a woman in Iran
02:46 - Inside the IRGC prison vs. Iran's public prison system
04:35 - Blackmail, survival, and being asked to spy for the IRGC
06:46 - Prisoner 97029: what losing her freedom taught her
08:20 - Refusing to let the regime break her
10:14 - Watching Iranian women lead the uprising
12:41 - How Iranian women are faring after the war
13:30 - A cellmate re-arrested: the crackdown on ex-prisoners
14:26 - The 12-day war and a record-long internet shutdown
15:30 - The contradiction of Iran: the people vs. the regime
18:03 - Why she opposes Western concessions to Tehran
20:27 - Can Iran's opposition unite behind a government in exile?
22:02 - Her message to Iranian women








Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

Reclaiming the Covenant on America's 250th (May 2026)

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   

 

 



AddToAny

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Search2

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive