Wednesday, June 04, 2025

  • Wednesday, June 04, 2025
  • Elder of Ziyon

CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, issued a condemnation of the attack by a Muslim man on peaceful and elderly demonstrators in Boulder, CO on Sunday:

This attack on the Run for Our Lives march in Boulder was a heinous and unacceptable crime.
If that would have been all they said, it would be an impressive statement. But being CAIR, of course that wasn't the case. They added:

The person who perpetrated this violence in Boulder is a criminal whose unacceptable actions do not, in any way, represent the countless Americans of diverse backgrounds who are peacefully advocating for an end to the genocide of Palestinians in Gaza
Suddenly, the attacker has transformed into a protester of "genocide" whose methods might be wrong but whose heart was in the right place: destroy Israel with lies.

CAIR goes on:

Peaceful protests, political engagement, and civil disobedience are the only ways to change policies in our nation. 
As we speak out against this unacceptable crime in Boulder, we also reject the cynical attempts by anti-Palestinian racists and anti-Muslim extremists who seek to use this attack to justify their own bigotry and their war on free speech in America. 

Unlike those politicians who have never once condemned any of the shootings, stabbings, car rammings, beatings, and other violence directed at pro-Palestine demonstrators, and who actively support genocidal violence against Palestinians in Gaza, people of conscience condemn all criminal violence against all people, here and abroad. 

That’s called moral consistency.

So, we have one full sentence condemning the crime, two half sentences that condemn it while also saying that their political opponents are at least as bad as the terrorist, and two sentences that attack CAIR's critics while pretending to be moral. There is far more text of hurling hate and defending those who share the same politics as the terrorist than of condemning him. 

This isn't moral consistency. It is using an attack on Jews as an opportunity to further attack Jews.

There is one other word that shows that CAIR is a disgusting organization. In the introduction to the statement, it says by way of background:
On Sunday afternoon, a man used what authorities describe as a “makeshift flamethrower” to attack a group of marchers selectively calling for the release of captives held in Gaza. 
What does CAIR mean by using the term "selectively"? The only explanation I can think of is that CAIR is criticizing the protesters for not also calling for the release of Hamas terrorists in Israeli prisons.

It extols "peaceful protests" when done by people who hate Israel, but when it is done by Zionist Jews, CAIR implies, they are self-serving hypocrites for not also calling Israel to release more terrorists. 

CAIR is beneath contempt. Its "condemnation" is nothing of the sort - just an excuse to publish more and more hate, which turns into incitement that leads to attacks like this one.





Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

   
 

 



AddToAny

Printfriendly

EoZTV Podcast

Podcast URL

Subscribe in podnovaSubscribe with FeedlyAdd to netvibes
addtomyyahoo4Subscribe with SubToMe

search eoz

comments

Speaking

translate

E-Book

For $18 donation








Sample Text

EoZ's Most Popular Posts in recent years

Search2

Hasbys!

Elder of Ziyon - حـكـيـم صـهـيـون



This blog may be a labor of love for me, but it takes a lot of effort, time and money. For 20 years and 40,000 articles I have been providing accurate, original news that would have remained unnoticed. I've written hundreds of scoops and sometimes my reporting ends up making a real difference. I appreciate any donations you can give to keep this blog going.

Donate!

Donate to fight for Israel!

Monthly subscription:
Payment options


One time donation:

Follow EoZ on Twitter!

Interesting Blogs

Blog Archive