A good question for reporters to be asking this week about the Abraham Accords is why this regional "peace deal" doesn't seem to be supported by actual regional peace and human rights activists.The "experts" on the Middle East have been proven to be completely and totally wrong in their analysis, which incidentally has not changed at all since 1995.
In their universe, Palestinians who are dedicated to destroying Israel should have veto power over anything Israel does with any Arab state.
And for the years of the Obama administration, that is exactly how things were.
Then, Gulf states realized that their slavish dedication to supporting Palestinians who couldn't even solve their own internal split was counterproductive - and that partnering with Israel would bring great benefits.
So then the largest sea change in the Israeli-Arab conflict since Camp David happened - the Abraham Accords.
These "experts" were really upset that their formula didn't work, and they keep trying to shoehorn a radically changed Middle East into their old thinking, since they really have no imagination beyond "Israel bad, Palestinians good."
Hilariously, Duss resorts to saying that the "experts" - human rights activists who spend a large percentage of their time demonizing Israel - don't support the Abraham Accords, so therefore they must be meaningless.
Never in their wildest dreams can these blowhards consider that they have been wrong since - well, forever.
