 |
| Found in Kamal Adwan - or were they? |
They have published photos and videos of weapons found here. They caught known October 7 terrorists trying to escape from the hospital. They showed an interview with one of the Hamas operatives there confirming everything they said.
Not only that but it fits a pattern of Hamas having used many other hospitals in Gaza.
Now see how the New York Times tries to cast doubt on the video interview the IDF released:
The military released footage of what it said was an interrogation of one of the more than 240 militants it had arrested in raiding the hospital, saying it backed up Israel’s allegations that Hamas and other armed groups deliberately embed themselves in hospitals in violation of international law.The New York Times was not able to independently verify the claims made in the video, or to determine the circumstances under which the detainee made the admission. Israel has detained many Gazans in Sde Teiman, an army base in southern Israel, where many have been held in demeaning conditions and in which former detainees described beatings and other abuse. The Israeli military has denied accusations of systematic abuse there.
Ah, so the Israelis tortured the terrorist into saying what they wanted!
Students of conspiracy theories recognize what the New York Times is doing. No matter what evidence is brought, it can always be doubted because a huge influential entity can fake anything. The photos and videos of weapons are planted, the arrests were of innocent people, the detainees are coerced.
The implication is that the IDF is deliberately attacking hospitals for no valid military reason. Not only that, but even though the Israelis know that the laws of armed conflict specifically ban attacking hospitals unless they are being actively used for military purposes, they attack them anyway just because they are that evil, and then they hide their criminal activities with an elaborate coverup involving staging weapons, torturing confessions and getting shot at.
Soldiers are trained to attack enemies, not civilians. If Israel was just choosing a hospital to attack because they are hellbent on genocide - which is the only possible reason to do so that the New York Times would consider - wouldn't there be lots of disillusioned soldiers saying so? Wouldn't the NYT reporters be inundated with former soldiers anxious to tell their stories?
Not when the Times believes in conspiracy theories. Because it isn't the IDF only, but all of Israel - soldiers, reservists, their relatives, every newspaper and TV station and WhatsApp group, pretty much every Jew in the country - that is part of the plot.
The one thing the New York Times knows for sure is that Jews cannot be trusted.
But the claim that Palestinians are being held in "demeaning conditions" is reported as if it is factual, even though it came from an UNRWA report and UNRWA is not exactly an innocent objective party.
|
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
 |
Buy