The photo caption says, "Demonstrators blocked streets in Lower Manhattan to call for a cease-fire in Gaza on the first anniversary of the Hamas-led attacks on Israel." The "Cease Fire Now" sign is prominently highlighted as the main photo of the article.
The New York Daily News also shows that same sign. But they show it as it was seen for most of the march - behind several other much larger banners that led the demonstration.
Those banners included:
* Justification of Hamas murders, rapes and kidnappings "by any means necessary."
* Calls to "Globalize the Intifada," a direct call for worldwide violence against Jews and others.
* Calls for "resisting the nakba," another keyword they (and Hamas) use for terrorism.
The NYT didn't even allude to the explicit messages of hate and terror that were forced on thousands of Jewish New Yorkers working in Manhattan yesterday.
It gets even worse. The antisemites harassed Jews mourning the victims of 10/7 by explicitly praising the rapists.
The "newspaper of record" says "The protests across the city remained peaceful. " Tell that to Democratic Majority for Israel official Todd Richman who was assaulted and bloodied by a mob of "peaceful protesters."
The NYT pretends that the anti-Israel protestors call for peace and an end to war. But Within Our Lifetime and other protesters want war. They want violence. They want another intifada. They justify and call for more Hamas terrorism. They want more October 7ths. They say that as clearly as possible.
They just don't want Israel to defend herself.
It takes effort to highlight the sign the Times want their readers to see and to crop out the ones that disprove their thesis that the protests were for an end to war. It takes effort to avoid reporting on what is right in front of their faces. The NYT went through all that effort.
Because they are reporting propaganda, not the truth.
|
Or order from your favorite bookseller, using ISBN 9798985708424. Read all about it here! |
|
