Almost everyone recognizes the "Palestinians" as a nation, but the main question is whether or not they will ever create a state?
The general idea among most westerners is that peace can only be achieved via the two-state solution (TSS). There are prominent voices that disagree, such as Caroline Glick and Martin Sherman, both of the Jerusalem Post - Sherman, it should be noted, is also a prominent contributor to Jews Down Under - but the general consensus among western governments, including, of course, the Obama Administration, is that the only viable solution is the creation of a Palestinian-Arab state to represent the "Palestinian" nation.
In a recent piece for the Gatestone Institute, Louis René Beres discusses the fact that Israel will only accept a Palestinian-Arab state on its borders if it is demilitarized. Anyone who thinks that such an Israeli requirement is unreasonable can simply go beat sand because there is no way that the Jews of the Middle East are going to live under the threat of a Palestinian-Arab army on their border.
However, he also points out that even if such a provision were agreed to by Abbas and his people it would never hold up. As an Emeritus Professor of International Law at Purdue University, he probably knows what he's talking about. The take-away is that under international law - whatever that is, exactly - there are all sorts of means and methods by which the Palestinian-Arabs could bypass anti-militarization provisions.
When, and if, the Palestinian-Arabs ever agree to a state for themselves it will not be demilitarized.
On the contrary, its primary function will be that of a big Arab club against the Jewish minority in the Middle East.
This being the case, it raises the question of why Jewish people are under any ethical or moral obligation to recognize "Palestinian" nationhood to begin with?
This is why more and more of us are putting the word "Palestinian" in quotation marks.
It is becoming increasingly difficult for Jewish people, and friends, to recognize an alleged nation that only came into existence within living memory for the specific purpose of undermining Jewish sovereignty on traditional Jewish land.
The "Palestinian" nation is distinct from the rest of the Arab world in only one significant way.
Its purpose is to kill Jews.
That's it and that is all.
Benedict Anderson, who was a highly regarded political scientist and historian at Cornell University (just recently deceased) suggested that nations are "imagined communities" i.e., social constructs.
If this is true - as in historically accurate - then there is no more obvious case than the Palestinian-Arabs.
The bottom line is that the Jewish people, anywhere in the world, are under no obligation to respect a people who came into existence "as a people" for the sole purpose of destroying the Jews.
In my view, this is what the Israeli government needs to tell the West in a direct and forthright manner.
Given Israeli intellectual clout, economic significance, and military strength, maybe it is time for Jerusalem to tell Washington D.C., Paris, and London to respect their Jewish neighbors and friends.
The truth is that because of Jewish talent, concentrated in Israel, we are developing friends throughout the rest of the world, including Africa and China and Japan (and the rest of south-east Asia) and even Russia and other countries.
"Palestinian Nationhood" is an Arafat legacy and an artificial construction from the long-dead Soviet regime.
Perhaps it's time to bury it.
Michael Lumish is a blogger at the Israel Thrives blog as well as a regular contributor/blogger at Times of Israel and Jews Down Under.
We have lots of ideas, but we need more resources to be even more effective. Please donate today to help get the message out and to help defend Israel.