A free, pro-Western Iran wouldn't just benefit Iranians. It would be one of the most consequential geopolitical wins in a generation — and it maps almost perfectly onto what "America First" actually demands: less entanglement, stronger allies, cheaper energy, and adversaries put on the back foot. The collapse of this regime would solve or reduce multiple problems at once.
It Deals a Structural Blow to China
China buys 80–90% of Iran's oil exports - at steep sanctions discounts that effectively subsidize its industrial machine. That cheap fuel, combined with Iran's role as a BRI corridor and BRICS partner, makes Tehran one of Beijing's more useful strategic relationships. It is not irreplaceable, but genuinely valuable.
A democratic Iran changes the math entirely. Iranian oil returns to the open market, sold at market prices to whoever pays most. China loses its discount supplier, its BRICS partner, and a key node in its anti-Western coalition simultaneously. It would also have to reckon with a pro-Western government sitting astride regional trade routes it had counted on controlling.
This a structural setback for Beijing, the kind that forces a strategic recalculation.
It Kneecaps Russia
Since the Ukraine war began, Iran has been one of Russia's most consequential military suppliers. Shahed drones, produced cheaply and in volume, have reshaped the battlefield in ways NATO planners are still adjusting to. That supply chain runs through the Islamic Republic.
Regime change ends it. Russia fights on but with one fewer arsenal to draw from and one fewer sanctions-hardened partner willing to absorb Western economic pressure alongside it. Every Shahed that doesn't get built is a Ukrainian city that doesn't get hit.
It Stabilizes the Gulf — and Reverses the Saudi Drift
Saudi Arabia has been hedging toward China, and the reasons aren't hard to understand. Riyadh looks at American foreign policy and sees an unreliable partner, one that oscillates between maximum pressure and nuclear appeasement, that withdrew from Afghanistan in chaos, that has never quite resolved what it wants the Middle East to look like. Meanwhile, Iranian aggression through proxies - the Houthis threatening Red Sea shipping, Hezbollah destabilizing Lebanon, Hamas making normalization politically toxic - makes any bold Saudi diplomacy look reckless.
A pro-Western Iran changes both calculations simultaneously. The Sunni-Shia cold war that has organized Gulf politics for four decades loses its engine. The existential Iranian threat that has kept Gulf states in permanent defensive crouch fades. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and other moderate Arab states suddenly have far more room to maneuver - toward the United States, toward Israel, toward a regional order that doesn't require Chinese patronage as insurance against Iranian aggression.
American strength creates the conditions for Gulf stability. Gulf stability ends the drift toward Beijing. The logic is straightforward.
The Abraham Accords Get Their Momentum Back
The Abraham Accords were genuinely historic, and they stalled not because Arab states secretly oppose normalization with Israel, but because Iran made the cost of visible friendship with Israel much higher. Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis function as instruments of Iranian policy as much as anything else. Their purpose is to ensure that any Arab leader who moves toward Israel faces a domestic and regional firestorm funded and armed from Tehran.
Remove Iranian sponsorship of the rejectionist axis and the landscape shifts dramatically. Moderate Arab governments that have wanted normalization for years - and have been quietly pursuing it in back channels - suddenly have political space to move openly. Saudi-Israeli normalization, which seemed tantalizingly close before October 7, becomes achievable again. The rejectionist veto over Arab politics, held in place by Iranian money and Iranian weapons, dissolves.
Energy Prices Come Down
Iran holds some of the world's largest proven oil and gas reserves, currently constrained by sanctions, mismanagement, and deliberate underinvestment. A democratic Iran rejoining the global energy market as a legitimate producer means a meaningful increase in supply — which means lower prices.
This is good for American consumers. It's good for European allies still painfully weaning themselves off Russian energy. And it's bad for every petrostate whose fiscal models depend on prices staying elevated. Lower energy prices are themselves a form of strategic pressure on America's adversaries, achieved not through policy but through market reality.
Ninety Million Iranians Get Their Country Back
The Islamic Republic is not Iran. It is a revolutionary theocracy that has held one of the world's oldest and most sophisticated civilizations hostage for forty-five years. The Iranian people - educated, cosmopolitan, with deep historical ties to the West and a cultural inheritance stretching back millennia - have been trying to communicate this for decades.
A free Iran is not a client state or a nation-building project. It is a natural ally - one with a population already oriented toward democratic values, enormous human capital, and energy wealth that would benefit the entire world. For once, the idealists and the realists want exactly the same thing.
The foreign policy class has long treated "stability" in the Middle East as meaning the preservation of existing arrangements, however dysfunctional. But the Islamic Republic isn't stable — it is a source of instability, exported deliberately and systematically across the region for forty-five years. Its fall wouldn't destabilize the Middle East. It would remove the single greatest source of destabilization the region has.
Yes, it is good for Israel. But it is even better for America.
|
"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024) PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022) |
 |
Buy