Pages

▼

Tuesday, December 02, 2025

12/02 Links Pt1: Hamas is Failing to Rebuild Its Iron Rule; A Response to Ben Rhodes' New York Times Piece on Gaza; Islamic Socialism Takes on the West

From Ian:

Hamas is Failing to Rebuild Its Iron Rule
Why Hamas Can’t Rebuild Its Rule
Frozen funding, escalating extortion, and growing public scorn have pushed the group into a self-defeating spiral
Gaza watchers generally hold that the more time goes by, the more Hamas will be able to retrench and reestablish control in the western half of the Strip, from which Israel withdrew in October. They see a “Tale of Two Gazas,” in which an authoritarian Hamas statelet, west of the so-called yellow line that now divides the Strip, achieves dominance on par with the iron grip that communist East Germany had on its citizens during the Cold War.

This widespread view has frightened foreign governments who are being asked to contribute troops to an International Stabilization Force (ISF) for the territory. Their reluctance to commit soldiers may eventually strengthen calls within Israel to abrogate the October 10 ceasefire and try to finish off Hamas without a multilateral framework. But is the fear well-founded?

The armed group is indeed applying new levels of violence and intimidation in a bid for authority. In just the first days and weeks following the ceasefire, it murdered at least 80 alleged “collaborators” in ISIS-style public executions. It is premature, however, to view Hamas’s retrenchment as a foregone conclusion.

To establish a viable new regime, Hamas needs to achieve what Hezbollah did after the 2006 Second Lebanon War — namely, a massive commitment of assistance from a foreign patron to rebuild its destroyed territory. But the equivalent monies aren’t coming. As a result, Hamas must employ ever-increasing levels of brutality against its own civilians in order to extract funds. The heavy-handed measures it has taken are enraging civilians, most of whom already blame the armed group for triggering the destruction of their territory by launching the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel that sparked the war.

The consequence, for Hamas, is a vicious cycle in which the more aggressively it tries to reassert its authority, the more it isolates itself from the population and even some of its own recruits.

Like what you’re reading? Consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This predicament crystallized for Hamas on October 20, when White House advisor Jared Kushner told reporters that while the U.S. and its allies will be raising money for Gaza’s rehabilitation, “no reconstruction funds will be going into areas that Hamas controls.” Longtime Hamas supporters Qatar and Turkey, which the U.S. considers key players in post-war planning, appear to have fallen in line with Kushner’s position for now.
John Spencer: A Response to Ben Rhodes' New York Times Piece on Gaza
The New York Times Dec. 1 opinion piece, "This Is the Story of How the Democrats Blew It on Gaza," by Ben Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser under President Obama, is appalling for anyone who cares about the truth. This feature-length essay repeats misinformation, inserts falsehoods, and advances a moral narrative that bears no resemblance to the laws of war or the realities of modern conflict. If these arguments are taken seriously inside Washington, they threaten not only Israel's security but America's.

An explicit condition of the rules-based order since 1945 is that sovereign nations may defend themselves after an armed attack. It is the most basic tenet of the UN Charter. Israel did not choose this war. It was launched against Israel on Oct. 7 when Hamas killed more than 1,200 people and kidnapped more than 250. Any democratic state, including the U.S., would have responded with immediate and overwhelming military force to achieve their goals as quickly as possible. That is the standard the author refuses to apply to Israel.

Only the uninformed or the deeply biased believe Israel intentionally targets civilians. These accusations are false, and to pretend the facts are ambiguous is not analysis. It is distortion. The argument that President Biden gave Israel unconditional support is also false. The administration held up key arms shipments. Israeli soldiers were forced to adapt operations in real time because of delayed or restricted U.S. support.

The laws of war do not judge outcomes alone. They judge intent, precautions, proportionality, distinction, and military necessity. Israel has taken more measures to reduce civilian harm than any military in history and often put its own soldiers at greater risk to protect civilians.

The author also invokes the biggest lie of this war, the claim that Israel is committing genocide. There is no genocide in Gaza. Israel has no intent to destroy in whole or in part the civilian population of Gaza. It sought to destroy Hamas as a military and political organization while doing more to feed, house, vaccinate, provide medical care, and prevent harm to the civilian population than any nation in history.

Wanting to destroy your enemy is not genocide. It is war. War is not illegal, and in some cases it is necessary. Every nation, including the U.S., has faced the moral dilemma of civilian deaths in a legitimate war of self-defense. Nations must prioritize their own citizens and their own survival. That is a foundation of the laws of armed conflict. Supporting an ally in a lawful war of self-defense is not a betrayal of our values. It is an expression of them.
Islamic Socialism Takes on the West
When New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani met President Trump at the White House in November, the cordial encounter between the self-described Muslim socialist and the former president puzzled many observers. How should Americans understand Mamdani’s blend of Islamic identity and Democratic Socialist activism? Is he, as Congresswoman Elise Stefanik claimed, a “jihadist,” or as Trump suggested, “rational”?

The answer lies in understanding a century-old ideological tradition that melds Islamic theology with socialist revolutionary theory in ways that produce unpredictable and often dangerous outcomes. This fusion operates according to a logic articulated by neo-Marxist philosopher Herbert Marcuse, who argued for destroying the liberal democratic order by creating a “new sensibility”—one that would demolish existing social structures to create something unprecedented, unpredictable, and radically different from Western civilization’s foundations.

Islamic socialism is not merely an intellectual curiosity. It represents a systematic challenge to Western democratic values, one that emerged from the Bolshevik Revolution and continues to shape American politics today.

The Origins: Soviet Islamic Communism
Islamic socialism was born in the aftermath of the Russian Revolution, when Vladimir Lenin successfully courted Muslim constituents of the Russian empire. Though their alliance may have been a marriage of convenience, both groups saw symmetry between their ideologies. For socialists, philosophy ruled, and the end goal was societal transformation. Muslims saw their faith similarly—as a comprehensive system for remaking society.

The Marxist dialectic promised that contradictions between Islam and socialism would resolve themselves over time through social discourse. Opposing ideas would clash, then synthesize into something new and unpredictable. This was not a bug but a feature of the ideology.

Two foundational theorists exemplified this synthesis: Azerbaijani Misaid Sultan Galiev and Muslim reformist Nariman Narimanov, both Shia Muslims. Narimanov depicted Lenin as a prophet and defender of the oppressed. In Soviet propaganda posters, the Muslim revolutionary communist appeared as an Orientalist hero wielding a sword and straddling a horse, combining spiritual and communist themes under slogans like “Gather in love! Under the light of the Red star!”

This Soviet Islamic communism became foundational for Third World Marxism and postcolonial thought, including the theoretical framework behind the Palestinian cause. Years before Frantz Fanon wrote The Wretched of the Earth, Soviet Muslim socialists were theorizing about the psychology of the oppressed and the necessity of revolutionary violence.


'Highly likely' remains transferred by Hamas not of deceased hostage, Israeli source tells 'Post'
The remains transferred by Hamas are "highly likely" not of a deceased hostage, an Israeli source told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday evening.

However, the identification process of the remains at Abu Kabir is "still ongoing," according to the Health Ministry.

A coffin containing the potential remains of a deceased Gaza hostage arrived at the National Institute of Forensic Medicine at Abu Kabir for identification on Tuesday evening, according to the Health Ministry.

The IDF and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) received the "findings" from the International Committee of the Red Cross, transferred from the Gaza Strip, the Prime Minister's Office confirmed earlier on Tuesday afternoon.

Earlier today, a Hamas official told Reuters it would turn over the remains of one of the two remaining deceased hostages still in Gaza.

The PMO also confirmed that Israel was preparing to receive "findings" from the Red Cross in a morning statement.

"Israel is preparing to receive from the Red Cross findings that were transferred from the Gaza Strip," the PMO stated. It is yet unclear if the "findings" refer to remains belonging to a hostage.
Seth Frantzman: UAE celebrates its 54th anniversary as it presses for ceasefire progress, Gaza plan
The UAE's celebration of Union Day coincides with the two-year anniversary of the launch of "Operation Noble Knight 3," the UAE's largest relief operation to aid the people of Gaza, on November 5, 2023. The UAE has also backed the ceasefire brokered by the US in October. UAE state media noted that after the ceasefire deal “the UAE Humanitarian Ship set sail today for the Gaza Strip as part of Operation Chivalrous Knight 3, carrying 7,200 tonnes of relief supplies aimed at meeting urgent needs and alleviating the suffering of people in the Strip.”

The report added that “the shipment includes 4,680 tonnes of essential food supplies, 2,160 tonnes of shelter materials, tents and winter clothing, along with 360 tonnes of medical supplies and four water tanks. The cargo represents a comprehensive humanitarian response addressing the most pressing daily needs of Gaza’s population.” These initiatives come directly from the top due to President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, “who places humanitarian work among the country’s top priorities and ensures the continuity of relief support for the people of Gaza,” UAE state media noted.

The convoys of aid from the UAE continue to flow. These include food, medical needs, and basic necessities, as well as shelter. Al-Ain noted, “the successive convoys included food, medical, shelter, and health parcels, in addition to parcels designated for winter clothing, and parcels specifically for women and children, reflecting the operation’s keenness to meet the needs of various affected groups in the Gaza Strip.” Abu Dhabi has also donated 33 ambulances, medical tents, and 36 water tankers to Gaza. Field bakeries have also been supplied to help produce food amidst the ruins. The UAE also backs water and infrastructure projects in Gaza.

According to the report, “the UAE humanitarian aid team oversees the preparation and dispatch of these convoys through the humanitarian aid logistics center in Al-Arish city, where the team handles the receiving, storage, repackaging and preparation operations, to ensure the speed and efficiency of delivering aid to the sector in coordination with the relevant authorities.” For instance, a water project in Gaza, which the report terms the “largest” one of its kind, helps provide desalinated water to tens of thousands of people. “The Emirati water pipeline stretches 7.5 kilometers with a production capacity of approximately two million gallons per day, serving more than 600,000 people.”

The UAE is concerned about the future of Gaza. As it continues to support aid, an editorial at The National in the UAE expresses concern that Gaza will continue to be divided between an area controlled by the IDF and the rest of Gaza, where around 2 million people shelter amid hardship and destruction caused by the war. The editorial expressed concern that the small enclave will be “cleaved” in two. The UAE wants to see progress on the ceasefire plan. The editorial expressed grave concern about what might come in 2026 unless progress is made.
Trump strengthens ties with Syria, urges Israel not to interfere
Less than a week after six Israeli soldiers were wounded in clashes in the village of Beit Jinn in southern Syria, President Donald Trump said in a post on Truth Social that it was important that “nothing takes place that will interfere with Syria’s evolution into a prosperous State.”

Trump wrote that the new president of Syria is “working diligently to make sure good things happen, and that both Syria and Israel will have a long and prosperous relationship together.”

It was “very important that Israel maintain a strong and true dialogue with Syria,” he added.

The president also addressed the lifting of sanctions following the fall of Bashar Assad’s regime in December 2024, writing: “One of the things that has helped them greatly was my termination of very strong and biting sanctions — I believe this was truly appreciated by Syria, its Leadership, and its People!”

He concluded that this is a “Historic opportunity, and adds to the SUCCESS, already attained, for PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST!”

After the remarks, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke with Trump. According to the Prime Minister’s Office, both stressed the importance and their commitment to dismantling Hamas and disarming the Gaza Strip, and discussed expanding the peace agreements. At the end of the call, Trump invited Netanyahu to a meeting at the White House in the near future.

Trump’s post was published against the backdrop of the Beit Jinn incident that took place last Friday. IDF troops entered the village in southern Syria, about 11 kilometers (7 miles) from the border, to arrest suspects belonging to Jamaa Islamiya, the Lebanese branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Gunfire was directed at the forces during the operation, and six soldiers were wounded, three of them seriously. The Syrian Foreign Ministry condemned the operation and called it a war crime, claiming that 13 Syrians were killed in Israeli strikes.


Almost a third of Norway's 2026 State Budget agreement is about Gaza, Israel
A disproportionately high 30% of Norway’s national budget agreement for 2026 is about Gaza and Israel, accounting for five out of 17 clauses.

The document, signed on November 29, is an agreement between the ruling Labour Party, the Centre Party, and the Red Party regarding the state budget for 2026.

By signing it, the parties commit to voting for the consensus on the state budget for 2026 and not forming any other majorities in connection with the budget process.

The parties signed 17 clauses, the first 12 of which are about health and dental care, trade, the environment, the rental market, and social assistance. Clauses 13 to 17 are all about Israel and the Palestinians.

What are they?
Norway's budget clauses on Israel and Palestine
• Clause 13 requests that the government push central bank Norges Bank (which manages the Oil Fund and Pension Fund) to ensure Norway’s actions comply with the Genocide Convention, and that the Oil Fund’s investments do not create any risk of contributing to international-law violations in “Palestine.”
• Clause 14 requests that the government, in cooperation with countries in the region, work to ensure Israeli responsibility for the reconstruction of Gaza.
• Clause 15 requests that the government raise Israel’s obligations under international law to “prevent abuses by, and prosecute violations committed by, violent settlers – in relevant international forums.”
• Clause 16 requests that the government introduce a legal ban on the import of goods originating from, and the export of goods to, the “Israeli settlements in Palestine that violate international law,” and take the initiative for other countries to introduce similar bans.
• Clause 17 requests that the government submit a resolution to the UN General Assembly emphasizing Israel’s responsibility to comply with the International Court of Justice’s advisory opinion of October 22, 2025 (which states that Israel is obligated to lift restrictions on UNRWA’s operations and agree to and facilitate relief provided by the Agency).


Pro-Palestinians desecrate memorial to 2-year old killed by Palestinian terrorists
Pro-Palestinian activists in Rome have defaced a memorial to a two-year old Jewish boy who was murdered in a 1982 attack by Palestinian terrorists on the city’s main synagogue, with the president of the Jewish community condemning the country’s “spiral of hatred” and a “climate of intimidation” for Jews.

The day after an anti-Israel protest was held outside the Beth Michael synagogue in Rome’s Monteverde neighbourhood, congregants found that graffiti, including slogans such as “free Palestine” and “Monteverde is anti-Zionist and anti-Fascist” had been sprayed on the synagogue itself. A memorial plaque outside to the two-year old Stefano Gaj Taché, killed in the 1982 terror attack on Rome’s Great Synagogue, was also graffitied.

Victor Fadlun, president of Rome’s Jewish community, said: “In the aftermath of yet another pro-Palestinian demonstration, the dedication plaque at the Monteverde synagogue was desecrated…this is all part of a climate of intimidation.”

Fadlun went on to describe how “antisemitism has become the most despicable tool of political protest” and called for “decisive government intervention to halt this spiral of hatred.

“This is an act that outrages the Jewish community, it deeply wounds it,” he went on to say.

“This is a gathering place where families, children, and young people meet. The synagogue is a place…where people go to pray, but also to get to know one another and build a sense of community. Attacking the synagogue in this way means denying and infringing on the right of Jews to lead a normal life, and this is unacceptable.”

The 1982 terror attack on Rome’s Great Synagogue, carried out by Palestinians from the Abu Nidal terrorist organisations, saw the 5 perpetrators throw grenades and fire with machine guns at congregants leaving the shul after Shabbat morning prayers. 37 people were wounded and one – Stefano – was killed.


'First robotics war': Defense Ministry shows how robotic systems used in Israel-Hamas War
The 2023-2025 Israel-Hamas War was the first-ever robotics war, Col. (ret.) Yaron Sarig, head of the AI and Autonomy Program Executive Office of MAFAT within the Defense Ministry, said on Monday.

“This is the first robotics war,” he said. “In this conflict, we have mobilized our entire defense ecosystem and deployed tens of thousands of autonomous systems across the battlefield – from drone swarms to agile ground robotics distributed across vast areas.”

Although remotely controlled drones and some other systems have been used for a longer period of time, Sarig revealed at the International Defense Tech Summit sponsored by the Defense Ministry’s DDR&D and the Yuval Ne’eman Science, Technology and Security Workshop at Tel Aviv University, that thousands of kilometers of the invasion in Gaza were carried out by robotic systems.

The robotic systems have gotten much more diverse and standardized, being deployed in much higher volumes to assist with exploring Hamas tunnels, to save risking soldiers’ lives from that process.

In addition, remote vehicles were used to enter new areas above ground to crash into Hamas positions or to intercept and spring ambushes, so that soldiers could come in afterwards knowing where concealed Hamas fighters were located.
IDF kills three terrorists breaching Gaza ceasefire yellow line
Israeli forces killed three terrorists on Tuesday after they crossed a designated buffer zone and approached Israeli troops in separate incidents in northern and southern Gaza, the Israel Defense Forces said.

Two of the terrorists were killed in southern Gaza after crossing the yellow line and posing an immediate threat to troops, according to an IDF statement. In a separate incident in northern Gaza, another terrorist was eliminated after similarly crossing the line.

The Israeli Air Force carried out the strikes in both cases.

IDF troops remain deployed in accordance with the ceasefire agreement and will continue to respond to immediate threats, the military said.
IDF raids offices of terror-linked Palestinian NGO
Israeli security forces on Monday raided the Judea and Samaria offices of the Union of Agricultural Work Committees, the Israel Defense Forces said on Tuesday.

“During operational activity in Ramallah and Hebron, IDF troops seized equipment and sealed the offices of the Palestinian organization UAWC, which is affiliated with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine terrorist organization,” according to the statement.

During the raid, soldiers confiscated inciting materials, arrested eight wanted individuals and detained 14 additional suspects for questioning. Equipment and funds worth roughly 700,000 shekels ($215,000) were also seized, the military said.

The operation concluded with soldiers carrying out a “full sealing of the main doors” of the UAWC offices in Judea and Samaria, the IDF said.

UAWC “presents itself as assisting agriculture, but in practice serves as an organizational arm of the PFLP terror group and works to promote incitement to terrorism, recruitment and the transfer of funds,” it added.

On Oct. 22, 2021, then-Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz designated six Palestinian NGOs, including UAWC, as terrorist groups linked to the PFLP. The PFLP is recognized as a terror organization by Israel, the European Union, the United States and most other Western nations.
Two IDF soldiers lightly wounded in Samaria terror attack
Two Israeli Defense Forces soldiers were lightly wounded on Tuesday morning in a Palestinian terrorist attack outside the community of Ateret in Samaria’s Binyamin region, the military confirmed.

“Following a report about a suspect near the community of Ateret in the Binyamin Brigade, IDF forces rushed to the location,” according to an IDF statement.

When the soldiers approached the suspect, “he began to stab the force, which responded with gunfire toward him and neutralized him,” the statement continued, adding that additional forces were rushed to the scene.

In a subsequent statement, the military said it closed the entrances to the nearby Arab village of Arura and set up roadblocks in the area in response to the stabbing attack.

The Binyamin Regional Council, which has jurisdiction over many communities in central Samaria, including Ateret, said that a more serious terror attack was prevented with the help of a resident who reported the suspect walking by the side of the road with a bag.

“Thanks to the vigilance of our residents, a far more serious attack was prevented,” stated Binyamin Regional Council head Israel Ganz, who also heads the Yesha Council umbrella group of Jewish communities.

“I want to commend the alert resident who reported the suspect, the [1208] hotline that works day and night for the residents of Binyamin, the Ateret situation room that tracked the terrorist and the brave IDF soldiers who sought engagement and eliminated him,” Ganz added.

In a separate terror attack overnight Monday, an IDF soldier sustained injuries in a vehicular assault at the Judea Junction in the Hebron area.

According to the army, a terrorist accelerated his vehicle toward soldiers stationed at the junction, striking and injuring a female soldier. She was evacuated to the hospital for treatment and her family was notified.

Troops opened fire at the terrorist, who managed to flee the scene. He was killed after a manhunt, the IDF announced in a later statement.
Restricted video Stupid Palestinian terrorist attacks 2 IDF soldiers with knife, dies.



Call me Back Podcast: Netanyahu Seeks Pardon - with Amit Segal and Nadav Eyal
Today’s episode:
On Sunday, Prime Minister Netanyahu submitted a formal request to President Isaac Herzog for a pardon in Netanyahu’s years-long corruption trial. The documents included an 111-page letter written by Netanyahu’s lawyer Amit Hadad, in which he argued that a pardon would allow the Prime Minister to focus squarely on advancing Israel’s interest and would help heal divisions within Israeli society. Notably, Netanyahu’s letter does not include an apology or admission of guilt. President Herzog issued an official response, stating, “After receiving all of the relevant opinions, the president will responsibly and sincerely consider the request.”

To unpack the details and implications of Netanyahu’s request for a pardon, Dan was joined by Ark Media contributors Nadav Eyal and Amit Segal.

(00:00) Introduction
(02:25) First reactions to Netanyahu’s plea
(07:00) Examining the precedents in Israeli presidential pardons
(11:23) What does Netanyahu hope to achieve?
(16:59) The case for pardoning Netanyahu
(19:26) The cases against Netanyahu, and why the trial is taking so long
(26:35) Does this all boil down to hatred of Netanyahu?
(31:30) Is the widespread hatred of Netanyahu justified?
(40:33) Unpacking the political landscape
(45:59) Herzog’s options and his legacy


Ask Haviv Anything: Episode 65: The unseen editors rigging the information war, with Ashley Rindsberg
The internet has democratized information. Or so we are told. The world's knowledge is now at everyone's fingertips. No government and no power structure can gatekeep what everyone sees and hears.

But as our lives increasingly move online, we are all discovering just how many forces are at work trying to control and manipulate the flow of information online. The information that comes our way is driven by algorithms shaped by corporations or foreign governments. And those who know how to game those algorithms now possess unprecedented control over what everyone sees on their phones and computers. Governments, political campaigns, advocacy movements all invest vast resources in shaping these environments to ensure their message dominates and opposing messages are suppressed.

In this episode, we take a deep dive into the surprisingly small number of editors who have managed to take control of Wikipedia's articles related to Israel, Israeli history and Zionism, and to skew them into narrow ideological screeds that no Israelis or Jews would recognize as representing them or their story.

It's a microcosm of a much larger story about the vulnerability of this new information environment in which we all swim to such manipulation.

Wikipedia is a critical reference for hundreds of millions of people. It is often counted among the five most visited websites in the world. But its real influence is far larger: it's a favored result in any Google search and a favorite source for AIs when they answer our questions. So it matters that a tiny group of no more than 40 editors, through careful coordination, can completely dominate all editing and content in a major arena of contested knowledge.

Wikipedia, Reddit and our new age of algorithmic information flows are our subject today, and Ashley Rindsberg, an American writer and a senior editor at Pirate Wires, is our guide.

Chapters
00:00 Introduction to Online Manipulation
03:17 The Wikipedia Dilemma
05:54 The Gang of 40: Wikipedia's Manipulators
09:07 The Impact of Wikipedia on Public Perception
11:59 The Challenges of Editing Wikipedia
15:13 The Role of Wikimedia Foundation
17:54 The Bias in Wikipedia's Structure
21:09 The Consequences of Manipulation
23:58 The Future of Wikipedia and Information Integrity
35:51 The Reliability of Information Sources
38:11 Investigating Wikipedia's Influence
41:04 The Knowledge Cartel: Google and Wikipedia
43:06 Understanding Reddit's Community Structure
46:32 Coordinated Networks and Propaganda
51:56 The Manipulation of Information on Reddit
01:00:57 The Role of AI in Information Dissemination
01:06:30 Raising Awareness of Digital Manipulation


Hugh Hewitt: Should Israel strike Hezbollah and Iran as they are clearly rebuilding with malice in their hearts?

Erin Molan: Trump’s Asylum Freeze: Erin Molan’s Most CONFLICTED Monologue Yet
In Epsiode 57 of The Erin Molan Show, Erin delivers one of her most emotional monologues ever as she reacts to President Trump’s decision to pause asylum requests after the deadly National Guard shooting in Washington, D.C. She explains why she believes it’s the right call to protect children — while also sharing a deeply personal story about her late father, Maj. Gen. Jim Molan, rescuing an Afghan family during the chaotic Kabul evacuation.

Then Erin is joined by Brooke Goldstein, human-rights lawyer and founder of The Lawfare Project, for a powerful conversation about rising radicalization in the West, the warning signs we keep ignoring, and why child indoctrination by extremist groups must be called what it is.

0:00 – Erin’s intro
1:20 – National Guard shooting & Trump’s asylum freeze
2:00 – Erin’s emotional story about her father in Afghanistan
3:25 – Why she’s conflicted but supports the decision
10:00 – Brooke Goldstein joins the show
22:57 – Fan feedback
27:00 – Erin Molan Speech at Boston event
34:50 – Erin Molan's #1 parenting advice with Marissa Streit from PragerU


NSFW




Buy EoZ's books  on Amazon!

"He's an Anti-Zionist Too!" cartoon book (December 2024)

PROTOCOLS: Exposing Modern Antisemitism (February 2022)

    
 

 

at