Okay, so it’s the Daily Mail, it's sensational. So you
don’t exactly trust it. Still, it was disturbing to read: “Teacher
is sacked for 'joking' to Jewish primary school pupils that she would 'ship
them off to the gas chambers' if they didn't finish their homework.”
The whole thing happened in front of a class of 28 ten-year-olds, 11 of whom are Jewish. Trying to get them to hand in their work, the teacher said, “You better finish off your work quick, or I’ll ship you all off to the gas chambers.”
The whole thing happened in front of a class of 28 ten-year-olds, 11 of whom are Jewish. Trying to get them to hand in their work, the teacher said, “You better finish off your work quick, or I’ll ship you all off to the gas chambers.”
The kids told their parents, the
teacher got fired, and that’s all fine, as far as I’m concerned. I don’t need a
backstory. These basic facts are enough. That teacher deserved to be fired.
 |
| Newberries Primary School, in Hertfordshire |
But one of my friends (let’s call him “Max”) thought the dismissal of the teacher was “a shonda for de goyim.” From his point of view, we had a chance to show this teacher just how wonderful and merciful we are, and instead of least giving her a chance to prove that she was ONLY JOKING, we got her fired.
To Max, it’s as if a
traditional antisemitic trope has been played out ON THE STAGE OF REAL LIFE and
now this teachers thinks we are nasty Jews who run the world and get people
fired.
This is sad and bad.
Max thinks we would have done
better to educate the teacher, (in particular about the destruction of the
Temple!) rather than fire her. Otherwise, he says, we are “only creating more
Jew-haters.”
Max, it is clear, prefers to take
a gentler approach, to be “nice” about the Holocaust, and assume the teacher
had only been joking, just like she said. He thinks we have no reason NOT to
believe her.
But this I do not understand: Why
does Max want to be “nice” about the Holocaust?
 |
| Scratch marks on gas chamber wall in Auschwitz |
No. There is no benign way to look at this. None at all.
I can’t judge Max, of course. I
can only turn his supposition around in my mind, try to see a context, weigh
these things against my own beliefs and come to a conclusion. Could she have
been joking? Could it be that to the teacher, threatening kids with gas
chambers was a way to inject some lighthearted fun into things? Like telling ghost stories in
the dark or going on a roller coaster? Like, “MWUHAHAHAHA, if you don’t do your
homework, I’ll send you to the gas chambers, My Pretties!”
You see what I did there,
right? I tried to look at things from the perspective of Max.
I failed.
Because there is no way young
minds should be exposed to such an attitude: such appalling insensitivity and
ignorance as that teacher displayed. And that is why the parents had to speak
out. It’s what we have to do, every single time someone is cavalier about the
horrors that have decimated our people. In particular in the case where the offender is an educator. And in particular in front of Jewish children, who feel these
things more deeply than their classmates. Which is only natural.
So you see, from my point of
view, this was exactly the right time to fire this teacher, and it was also the right thing
to do. Why? Because this teacher failed at her job in every possible way: as an educator, as an
example for young people, and as a human being.
Max thinks we should educate
the teacher. We could do that: give her a course on the Holocaust (rather than on
the destruction of the Temple). But here is what I wish Max understood: it is not
our responsibility to educate that teacher. It is her responsibility to educate
herself. It is every person’s responsibility to know and internalize the
lessons of this recent history: the lessons of the Holocaust.
We are speaking of a teacher. Presumably
college-educated. This person can read. What happened in the Holocaust is all on
record.
The Holocaust did not, after all, take place in Ancient
Greece.
This is contemporary history.
It's practically NOW.